TSTP Solution File: GEO147+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO147+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.78s 2.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    ( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
    | ~ connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vf8s6gkr/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).

cnf(i_0_96,negated_conjecture,
    connect(esk26_0,esk27_0,esk25_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vf8s6gkr/lgb.p',i_0_96) ).

cnf(i_0_95,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(esk25_0,trajectory_of(esk26_0))
    | ~ incident_o(esk25_0,trajectory_of(esk27_0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vf8s6gkr/lgb.p',i_0_95) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( incident_o(X1,trajectory_of(X2))
    | ~ once(at(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vf8s6gkr/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_32,plain,
    ( once(X1)
    | ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vf8s6gkr/lgb.p',i_0_32) ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    ( once(X1)
    | ~ once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vf8s6gkr/lgb.p',i_0_31) ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    ( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
    | ~ connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
    i_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
    connect(esk26_0,esk27_0,esk25_0),
    i_0_96 ).

cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(esk25_0,trajectory_of(esk26_0))
    | ~ incident_o(esk25_0,trajectory_of(esk27_0)) ),
    i_0_95 ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    ( incident_o(X1,trajectory_of(X2))
    | ~ once(at(X2,X1)) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( once(X1)
    | ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2)) ),
    i_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
    once(at_the_same_time(at(esk26_0,esk25_0),at(esk27_0,esk25_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_104]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ once(at(esk26_0,esk25_0))
    | ~ incident_o(esk25_0,trajectory_of(esk27_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    once(at(esk26_0,esk25_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( once(X1)
    | ~ once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
    i_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
    ~ incident_o(esk25_0,trajectory_of(esk27_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110])]) ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    once(at(esk27_0,esk25_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_108]) ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_106]),c_0_113])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO147+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:04:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.78/2.64  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.78/2.64  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.78/2.64  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.78/2.64  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S036I
% 8.78/2.64  # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqPosMax.
% 8.78/2.64  #
% 8.78/2.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 8.78/2.64  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.78/2.64  
% 8.78/2.64  # Proof found!
% 8.78/2.64  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.78/2.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.78/2.64  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.78/2.64  
% 8.78/2.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.78/2.64  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 8.78/2.64  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 8.78/2.64  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 8.78/2.64  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.78/2.64  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------