TSTP Solution File: GEO146-1 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : GEO146-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:59:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.89s 0.91s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO146-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:47:24 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 3.89/0.91 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.89/0.91 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 3.89/0.91 connect(sk28,sk27,sk29) | connect(sk27,sk28,sk29)).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c1, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 connect(sk28,sk27,sk29) | connect(sk27,sk28,sk29),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 3.89/0.91 once(at_the_same_time(at(X0,X1),at(X2,X1))) | ~connect(X0,X2,X1)).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk28 = X0).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk27 = X2).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk29 = X1).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c3, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 connect(sk27,sk28,sk29),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1, a2])], [c1, c2])).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c4, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 once(at_the_same_time(at(X0,X1),at(X2,X1))),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1, a2])], [c1, c2])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 3.89/0.91 once(at_the_same_time(X3,X4)) | ~once(at_the_same_time(X4,X3))).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 at_the_same_time(at(X0,X1),at(X2,X1)) = at_the_same_time(X4,X3)).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c6, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c7, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 once(at_the_same_time(X3,X4)),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c8, axiom,
% 3.89/0.91 connect(X5,X6,X7) | ~once(at_the_same_time(at(X5,X7),at(X6,X7)))).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 at_the_same_time(X3,X4) = at_the_same_time(at(X5,X7),at(X6,X7))).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c9, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c8])).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c10, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 connect(X5,X6,X7),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c8])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c11, axiom,
% 3.89/0.91 ~connect(sk27,sk28,sk29) | ~connect(sk28,sk27,sk29)).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 X5 = sk27).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 X6 = sk28).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 X7 = sk29).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c12, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6, a7])], [c10, c11])).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c13, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 ~connect(sk28,sk27,sk29),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6, a7])], [c10, c11])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c14, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 connect(sk28,sk27,sk29)).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a8, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk28 = sk28).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a9, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk27 = sk27).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a10, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk29 = sk29).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c15, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a8, a9, a10])], [c13, c14])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c16, axiom,
% 3.89/0.91 once(at_the_same_time(at(X8,X9),at(X10,X9))) | ~connect(X8,X10,X9)).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a11, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk27 = X8).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a12, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk28 = X10).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a13, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 sk29 = X9).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c17, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a11, a12, a13])], [c3, c16])).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c18, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 once(at_the_same_time(at(X8,X9),at(X10,X9))),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a11, a12, a13])], [c3, c16])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c19, axiom,
% 3.89/0.91 once(at_the_same_time(X11,X12)) | ~once(at_the_same_time(X12,X11))).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a14, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 at_the_same_time(at(X8,X9),at(X10,X9)) = at_the_same_time(X12,X11)).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c20, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a14])], [c18, c19])).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c21, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 once(at_the_same_time(X11,X12)),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a14])], [c18, c19])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c22, axiom,
% 3.89/0.91 connect(X13,X14,X15) | ~once(at_the_same_time(at(X13,X15),at(X14,X15)))).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a15, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 at_the_same_time(X11,X12) = at_the_same_time(at(X13,X15),at(X14,X15))).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c23, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15])], [c21, c22])).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c24, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 connect(X13,X14,X15),
% 3.89/0.91 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15])], [c21, c22])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c25, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 ~connect(sk28,sk27,sk29)).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a16, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 X13 = sk28).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a17, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 X14 = sk27).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(a18, assumption,
% 3.89/0.91 X15 = sk29).
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c26, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a16, a17, a18])], [c24, c25])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 cnf(c27, plain,
% 3.89/0.91 $false,
% 3.89/0.91 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X0, sk28),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X1, sk29),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X2, sk27),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X3, at(X2,X1)),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X4, at(X0,X1)),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X5, sk27),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X6, sk28),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X7, sk29),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X8, sk27),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X9, sk29),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X10, sk28),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X11, at(X10,X9)),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X12, at(X8,X9)),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X13, sk28),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X14, sk27),
% 3.89/0.91 bind(X15, sk29)
% 3.89/0.91 ],
% 3.89/0.91 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15, a16, a17, a18])).
% 3.89/0.91
% 3.89/0.91 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------