TSTP Solution File: GEO146-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO146-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 5 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(connect_defn_1,axiom,
( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3)))
| ~ connect(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jiXQVwfbgV/E---3.1_14765.p',connect_defn_1) ).
cnf(t12_156,negated_conjecture,
( connect(sk27,sk28,sk29)
| connect(sk28,sk27,sk29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jiXQVwfbgV/E---3.1_14765.p',t12_156) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3,axiom,
( once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jiXQVwfbgV/E---3.1_14765.p',symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3) ).
cnf(connect_defn_2,axiom,
( connect(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jiXQVwfbgV/E---3.1_14765.p',connect_defn_2) ).
cnf(t12_159,negated_conjecture,
( ~ connect(sk28,sk27,sk29)
| ~ connect(sk27,sk28,sk29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jiXQVwfbgV/E---3.1_14765.p',t12_159) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3)))
| ~ connect(X1,X2,X3) ),
connect_defn_1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( connect(sk27,sk28,sk29)
| connect(sk28,sk27,sk29) ),
t12_156 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( once(at_the_same_time(at(sk27,sk29),at(sk28,sk29)))
| connect(sk28,sk27,sk29) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2)) ),
symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( connect(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2))) ),
connect_defn_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(sk28,sk29),at(sk27,sk29))),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ connect(sk28,sk27,sk29)
| ~ connect(sk27,sk28,sk29) ),
t12_159 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
connect(sk28,sk27,sk29),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(sk27,sk29),at(sk28,sk29))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ connect(sk27,sk28,sk29),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO146-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 07:09:21 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jiXQVwfbgV/E---3.1_14765.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 14858 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 14861 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 114
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 90
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 24
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 56
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 54
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 26
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 26
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 30
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 6
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 24
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 132
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 92
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1831
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------