TSTP Solution File: GEO125-1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : GEO125-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:09:32 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.69s 1.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  10 unt;   1 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (  31 equ;  41 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    finish_point(sk26,sk25),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_4_10_2_133) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    finish_point(sk27,sk25),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_4_10_2_134) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    sk26 != sk27,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_4_10_2_135) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ ordered_by(X0,X2,X3)
    | between_o(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',between_o_defn_5) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ( ~ finish_point(X0,X1)
    | incident_o(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',finish_point_defn_12) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    ( ~ finish_point(X0,X1)
    | ~ incident_o(X2,X1)
    | X0 = X2
    | ordered_by(X1,X2,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',finish_point_defn_13) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2)
    | incident_o(X2,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o1_18) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    ( ~ between_o(X0,X1,X2,X3)
    | between_c(ax2_sk4(X0,X3,X2,X1),X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o3_24) ).

cnf(c_94,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | ~ between_c(X2,X0,X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-1.ax',between_c_defn_1) ).

cnf(c_148,plain,
    ~ between_c(X0,X1,X2,X1),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_94]) ).

cnf(c_5515,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    theory(equality) ).

cnf(c_5517,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | X2 != X1
    | X2 = X0 ),
    theory(equality) ).

cnf(c_7405,plain,
    ~ between_o(X0,X1,X2,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_148]) ).

cnf(c_8126,plain,
    ( sk26 != X0
    | sk27 != X0
    | sk26 = sk27 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_5517]) ).

cnf(c_8811,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ ordered_by(X0,X2,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_7405]) ).

cnf(c_9036,plain,
    sk26 = sk26,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_5515]) ).

cnf(c_9037,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | sk26 != X1
    | sk26 = X0 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_5517]) ).

cnf(c_9161,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ finish_point(X1,X0)
    | ~ incident_o(X2,X0)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_8811]) ).

cnf(c_9487,plain,
    sk27 = sk27,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_5515]) ).

cnf(c_9863,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | sk27 != X1
    | sk27 = X0 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_5517]) ).

cnf(c_13414,plain,
    ( X0 != sk26
    | sk26 != sk26
    | sk26 = X0 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_9037]) ).

cnf(c_13732,plain,
    ( X0 != sk27
    | sk27 != sk27
    | sk27 = X0 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_9863]) ).

cnf(c_15629,plain,
    ( ~ finish_point(X1,X0)
    | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_9161,c_69,c_9161]) ).

cnf(c_15630,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ finish_point(X1,X0)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_15629]) ).

cnf(c_15638,plain,
    ( ~ finish_point(X0,X1)
    | ~ finish_point(X2,X1)
    | ~ incident_o(X2,X1)
    | X0 = X2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_15630]) ).

cnf(c_26421,plain,
    ( ~ finish_point(X0,X1)
    | ~ finish_point(X2,X1)
    | X0 = X2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_15638,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_26425,plain,
    ( ~ finish_point(X0,sk25)
    | X0 = sk26 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_26421]) ).

cnf(c_26426,plain,
    ( ~ finish_point(X0,sk25)
    | X0 = sk27 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_26421]) ).

cnf(c_26469,plain,
    ~ finish_point(X0,sk25),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_26425,c_51,c_8126,c_9036,c_9487,c_13414,c_13732,c_26426,c_26425]) ).

cnf(c_26472,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_26469]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GEO125-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 20:24:53 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 7.69/1.66  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.69/1.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------  iProver source info
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 7.69/1.66  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 7.69/1.66  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.69/1.66  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Parsing...successful
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Proving...
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  clauses                                 88
% 7.69/1.66  conjectures                             3
% 7.69/1.66  EPR                                     32
% 7.69/1.66  Horn                                    57
% 7.69/1.66  unary                                   7
% 7.69/1.66  binary                                  33
% 7.69/1.66  lits                                    256
% 7.69/1.66  lits eq                                 25
% 7.69/1.66  fd_pure                                 0
% 7.69/1.66  fd_pseudo                               0
% 7.69/1.66  fd_cond                                 0
% 7.69/1.66  fd_pseudo_cond                          17
% 7.69/1.66  AC symbols                              0
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------ 
% 7.69/1.66  Current options:
% 7.69/1.66  ------ 
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  ------ Proving...
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.69/1.66  
% 7.69/1.66  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------