TSTP Solution File: GEO125-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO125-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.55s 4.73s
% Output : Refutation 4.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GEO125-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 20:04:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.35 Fri Jun 17 20:04:01 2022
% 0.18/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24521.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 117 during input processing: 0 [copy,117,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.35 117 back subsumes 105.
% 0.18/0.35 117 back subsumes 104.
% 0.18/0.35 117 back subsumes 103.
% 0.18/0.35 117 back subsumes 100.
% 0.18/0.35 117 back subsumes 99.
% 0.18/0.35 117 back subsumes 93.
% 0.18/0.35 117 back subsumes 92.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.90/1.10 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.90/1.10 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.90/1.10 number of clauses in intial UL: 92
% 0.90/1.10 number of clauses initially in problem: 108
% 0.90/1.10 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.90/1.10 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.90/1.10 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.90/1.10 absolute distinct symbol count: 43
% 0.90/1.10 distinct predicate count: 14
% 0.90/1.10 distinct function count: 26
% 0.90/1.10 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10
% 0.90/1.10 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 -------- PROOF --------
% 4.55/4.73 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.55/4.73 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 2 [ 3 15 96263 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 3 [ 6 8 50656 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 4 [ 8 8 52520 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 5 [ 11 8 51100 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 6 [ 5 5 28960 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 7 [ 8 13 84851 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 8 [ 12 7 48497 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 9 [ 9 7 51776 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 10 [ 11 8 53195 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 4.35 sec ----> 2162 [hyper,1286,42,117] {-} $F.
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 4.
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.55/4.73 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.55/4.73 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 42 [] {+} -between_c(A,B,C,D)|B!=D.
% 4.55/4.73 53 [] {+} -ordered_by(A,B,C)| -ordered_by(A,C,D)|between_o(A,D,C,B).
% 4.55/4.73 60 [] {+} -finish_point(A,B)|incident_o(A,B).
% 4.55/4.73 61 [] {+} -finish_point(A,B)|A=C| -incident_o(C,B)|ordered_by(B,C,A).
% 4.55/4.73 72 [] {+} -between_o(A,B,C,D)|between_c(ax2_sk4(A,D,C,B),B,C,D).
% 4.55/4.73 82 [] {-} sk26!=sk27.
% 4.55/4.73 83 [copy,82,flip.1] {+} sk27!=sk26.
% 4.55/4.73 115 [] {+} finish_point(sk26,sk25).
% 4.55/4.73 116 [] {+} finish_point(sk27,sk25).
% 4.55/4.73 117 [] {+} A=A.
% 4.55/4.73 142 [hyper,115,60] {+} incident_o(sk26,sk25).
% 4.55/4.73 181 [hyper,116,60] {+} incident_o(sk27,sk25).
% 4.55/4.73 221 [hyper,142,61,116,unit_del,83] {+} ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27).
% 4.55/4.73 910 [hyper,181,61,115,unit_del,83] {+} ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26).
% 4.55/4.73 1057 [hyper,221,53,910] {-} between_o(sk25,sk27,sk26,sk27).
% 4.55/4.73 1286 [hyper,1057,72] {-} between_c(ax2_sk4(sk25,sk27,sk26,sk27),sk27,sk26,sk27).
% 4.55/4.73 2162 [hyper,1286,42,117] {-} $F.
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.55/4.73 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 ============ end of search ============
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 true clauses given 3 (15.8%)
% 4.55/4.73 false clauses given 16
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 FALSE TRUE
% 4.55/4.73 4 0 4
% 4.55/4.73 5 0 2
% 4.55/4.73 6 0 6
% 4.55/4.73 7 0 4
% 4.55/4.73 8 0 13
% 4.55/4.73 9 1 11
% 4.55/4.73 10 0 17
% 4.55/4.73 11 6 26
% 4.55/4.73 12 8 21
% 4.55/4.73 13 26 33
% 4.55/4.73 14 20 31
% 4.55/4.73 15 39 25
% 4.55/4.73 16 17 10
% 4.55/4.73 17 27 48
% 4.55/4.73 18 31 69
% 4.55/4.73 19 54 73
% 4.55/4.73 20 45 64
% 4.55/4.73 21 8 38
% 4.55/4.73 22 22 46
% 4.55/4.73 23 37 6
% 4.55/4.73 24 7 9
% 4.55/4.73 25 47 16
% 4.55/4.73 26 10 17
% 4.55/4.73 27 22 19
% 4.55/4.73 28 11 6
% 4.55/4.73 29 26 19
% 4.55/4.73 30 8 30
% 4.55/4.73 31 38 25
% 4.55/4.73 32 6 22
% 4.55/4.73 33 10 23
% 4.55/4.73 34 19 11
% 4.55/4.73 35 17 30
% 4.55/4.73 36 10 27
% 4.55/4.73 37 24 56
% 4.55/4.73 38 7 21
% 4.55/4.73 39 28 11
% 4.55/4.73 40 12 29
% 4.55/4.73 41 1 9
% 4.55/4.73 42 12 25
% 4.55/4.73 43 41 25
% 4.55/4.73 44 12 17
% 4.55/4.73 45 0 23
% 4.55/4.73 46 14 37
% 4.55/4.73 47 17 14
% 4.55/4.73 48 12 2
% 4.55/4.73 49 6 26
% 4.55/4.73 50 14 14
% 4.55/4.73 51 14 23
% 4.55/4.73 52 6 5
% 4.55/4.73 53 2 2
% 4.55/4.73 54 14 12
% 4.55/4.73 55 12 12
% 4.55/4.73 56 0 16
% 4.55/4.73 57 2 12
% 4.55/4.73 58 2 14
% 4.55/4.73 60 0 2
% 4.55/4.73 tot: 824 1208 (59.4% true)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Model 10 [ 11 -100 53195 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.55/4.73
% 4.55/4.73 Process 24521 finished Fri Jun 17 20:04:05 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------