TSTP Solution File: GEO124+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO124+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:22:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 82.76s 83.02s
% Output   : Refutation 82.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (   7 unt;   1 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   40 (   0 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    start_point(skc3,skc5),
    file('GEO124+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    start_point(skc4,skc5),
    file('GEO124+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ equal(skc4,skc3),
    file('GEO124+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( ~ start_point(u,v)
    | incident_o(u,v) ),
    file('GEO124+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(36,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | ~ between_c(w,u,x,v) ),
    file('GEO124+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(62,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered_by(u,v,w)
    | ~ ordered_by(u,x,v)
    | between_o(u,w,v,x) ),
    file('GEO124+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(63,axiom,
    ( ~ start_point(u,v)
    | ~ incident_o(w,v)
    | equal(u,w)
    | ordered_by(v,u,w) ),
    file('GEO124+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(65,axiom,
    ( ~ between_o(u,v,w,x)
    | between_c(skf41(u,x,w,v),v,w,x) ),
    file('GEO124+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(90,plain,
    incident_o(skc4,skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,20]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,20.0')] ).

cnf(92,plain,
    incident_o(skc3,skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,20]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,20.0')] ).

cnf(94,plain,
    ( ~ start_point(skc4,u)
    | ~ incident_o(skc3,u)
    | ordered_by(u,skc4,skc3) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[63,4]),
    [iquote('0:Res:63.2,4.0')] ).

cnf(107,plain,
    ( ~ start_point(skc3,u)
    | ~ incident_o(skc4,u)
    | ordered_by(u,skc3,skc4) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[63,4]),
    [iquote('0:Res:63.2,4.0')] ).

cnf(120,plain,
    ( ~ incident_o(skc4,skc5)
    | ordered_by(skc5,skc3,skc4) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,107]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,107.1')] ).

cnf(126,plain,
    ordered_by(skc5,skc3,skc4),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[120,90]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:120.0,90.0')] ).

cnf(462,plain,
    ( ~ between_o(u,v,w,x)
    | ~ equal(v,x) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[65,36]),
    [iquote('0:Res:65.1,36.1')] ).

cnf(781,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(u,v,w)
    | ~ ordered_by(u,x,v)
    | ~ equal(w,x) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[62,462]),
    [iquote('0:Res:62.2,462.0')] ).

cnf(30843,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(skc5,u,skc3)
    | ~ equal(skc4,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[126,781]),
    [iquote('0:Res:126.0,781.0')] ).

cnf(30870,plain,
    ( ~ start_point(skc4,skc5)
    | ~ incident_o(skc3,skc5)
    | ~ equal(skc4,skc4) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[94,30843]),
    [iquote('0:Res:94.2,30843.0')] ).

cnf(30877,plain,
    ( ~ start_point(skc4,skc5)
    | ~ incident_o(skc3,skc5) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[30870]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:30870.2')] ).

cnf(30878,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[30877,2,92]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:30877.0,30877.1,2.0,92.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : GEO124+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:02:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 82.76/83.02  
% 82.76/83.02  SPASS V 3.9 
% 82.76/83.02  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 82.76/83.02  % SZS status Theorem
% 82.76/83.02  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 82.76/83.02  SPASS derived 28876 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 19370 clauses.
% 82.76/83.02  SPASS allocated 130579 KBytes.
% 82.76/83.02  SPASS spent	0:1:21.73 on the problem.
% 82.76/83.02  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 82.76/83.02  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 82.76/83.02  		0:00:00.45 for inferences.
% 82.76/83.02  		0:00:00.02 for the backtracking.
% 82.76/83.02  		0:1:20.92 for the reduction.
% 82.76/83.02  
% 82.76/83.02  
% 82.76/83.02  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 20 :
% 82.76/83.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 82.76/83.02  Formulae used in the proof : corollary_4_10_1 start_point_defn o4 between_c_defn part_of_defn between_o_defn o3
% 82.76/83.02  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------