TSTP Solution File: GEO124+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO124+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.60s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 10 unt; 4 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 50 ( 9 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ between_c(X3,X1,X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_60,plain,
( between_c(esk17_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between_o(X4,X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_60) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( between_o(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_77,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ordered_by(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ start_point(X1,X3)
| ~ incident_o(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_77) ).
cnf(i_0_28,negated_conjecture,
start_point(esk11_0,esk9_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_54,plain,
( incident_o(X1,X2)
| ~ ordered_by(X2,X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_54) ).
cnf(i_0_29,negated_conjecture,
start_point(esk10_0,esk9_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_78,plain,
( incident_o(X1,X2)
| ~ start_point(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_78) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
esk11_0 != esk10_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b8ryhcis/input.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ between_c(X3,X1,X4,X2) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
~ between_c(X1,X2,X3,X2),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_88]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
( between_c(esk17_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between_o(X4,X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_60 ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
~ between_o(X1,X2,X3,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( between_o(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X4,X3) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ordered_by(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ start_point(X1,X3)
| ~ incident_o(X2,X3) ),
i_0_77 ).
cnf(c_0_94,negated_conjecture,
start_point(esk11_0,esk9_0),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
( esk11_0 = X1
| ordered_by(esk9_0,esk11_0,X1)
| ~ incident_o(X1,esk9_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]) ).
cnf(c_0_97,plain,
( incident_o(X1,X2)
| ~ ordered_by(X2,X1,X3) ),
i_0_54 ).
cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
start_point(esk10_0,esk9_0),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_99,plain,
( incident_o(X1,X2)
| ~ start_point(X1,X2) ),
i_0_78 ).
cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
( esk11_0 = X1
| ~ ordered_by(esk9_0,X1,esk11_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]),c_0_97]) ).
cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
( esk10_0 = X1
| ordered_by(esk9_0,esk10_0,X1)
| ~ incident_o(X1,esk9_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_98]) ).
cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
incident_o(esk11_0,esk9_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_94]) ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
esk11_0 != esk10_0,
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]),c_0_102])]),c_0_103]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO124+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:49:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.60/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.60/2.44 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.60/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 7.60/2.44
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof found!
% 7.60/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.60/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object total steps : 26
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object clause steps : 17
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 7.60/2.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 7.60/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.60/2.44 # Parsed axioms : 88
% 7.60/2.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Initial clauses : 88
% 7.60/2.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 88
% 7.60/2.44 # Processed clauses : 111
% 7.60/2.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # ...subsumed : 2
% 7.60/2.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 109
% 7.60/2.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 7.60/2.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Generated clauses : 197
% 7.60/2.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 161
% 7.60/2.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 7.60/2.44 # Paramodulations : 180
% 7.60/2.44 # Factorizations : 10
% 7.60/2.44 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 7.60/2.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 108
% 7.60/2.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 7.60/2.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 7.60/2.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 89
% 7.60/2.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 137
% 7.60/2.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 615
% 7.60/2.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1564
% 7.60/2.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 592
% 7.60/2.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 7.60/2.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 553
% 7.60/2.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 15
% 7.60/2.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.60/2.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4357
% 7.60/2.44
% 7.60/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.60/2.44 # User time : 0.023 s
% 7.60/2.44 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.60/2.44 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 7.60/2.44 # ...preprocessing : 0.019 s
% 7.60/2.44 # ...main loop : 0.009 s
% 7.60/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.60/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------