TSTP Solution File: GEO124+1 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : GEO124+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:07:00 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  136 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  162 (  57   ~;  57   |;  37   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   89 (   6 sgn  58   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(between_c_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X3,X5,X7] :
      ( between_c(X1,X3,X5,X7)
    <=> ( X3 != X7
        & ? [X8] :
            ( part_of(X8,X1)
            & end_point(X3,X8)
            & end_point(X7,X8)
            & inner_point(X5,X8) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kbPx8f9qDG/E---3.1_12723.p',between_c_defn) ).

fof(start_point_defn,axiom,
    ! [X3,X9] :
      ( start_point(X3,X9)
    <=> ( incident_o(X3,X9)
        & ! [X5] :
            ( ( X3 != X5
              & incident_o(X5,X9) )
           => ordered_by(X9,X3,X5) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kbPx8f9qDG/E---3.1_12723.p',start_point_defn) ).

fof(corollary_4_10_1,conjecture,
    ! [X9,X3,X5] :
      ( ( start_point(X3,X9)
        & start_point(X5,X9) )
     => X3 = X5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kbPx8f9qDG/E---3.1_12723.p',corollary_4_10_1) ).

fof(o3,axiom,
    ! [X3,X5,X7,X9] :
      ( between_o(X9,X3,X5,X7)
    <=> ? [X1] :
          ( ! [X3] :
              ( incident_o(X3,X9)
            <=> incident_c(X3,X1) )
          & between_c(X1,X3,X5,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kbPx8f9qDG/E---3.1_12723.p',o3) ).

fof(between_o_defn,axiom,
    ! [X9,X3,X5,X7] :
      ( between_o(X9,X3,X5,X7)
    <=> ( ( ordered_by(X9,X3,X5)
          & ordered_by(X9,X5,X7) )
        | ( ordered_by(X9,X7,X5)
          & ordered_by(X9,X5,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kbPx8f9qDG/E---3.1_12723.p',between_o_defn) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X3,X5,X7] :
      ( between_c(X1,X3,X5,X7)
    <=> ( X3 != X7
        & ? [X8] :
            ( part_of(X8,X1)
            & end_point(X3,X8)
            & end_point(X7,X8)
            & inner_point(X5,X8) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[between_c_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X3,X9] :
      ( start_point(X3,X9)
    <=> ( incident_o(X3,X9)
        & ! [X5] :
            ( ( X3 != X5
              & incident_o(X5,X9) )
           => ordered_by(X9,X3,X5) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[start_point_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X9,X3,X5] :
        ( ( start_point(X3,X9)
          & start_point(X5,X9) )
       => X3 = X5 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[corollary_4_10_1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X85,X86,X87,X88,X90,X91,X92,X93,X94] :
      ( ( X86 != X88
        | ~ between_c(X85,X86,X87,X88) )
      & ( part_of(esk14_4(X85,X86,X87,X88),X85)
        | ~ between_c(X85,X86,X87,X88) )
      & ( end_point(X86,esk14_4(X85,X86,X87,X88))
        | ~ between_c(X85,X86,X87,X88) )
      & ( end_point(X88,esk14_4(X85,X86,X87,X88))
        | ~ between_c(X85,X86,X87,X88) )
      & ( inner_point(X87,esk14_4(X85,X86,X87,X88))
        | ~ between_c(X85,X86,X87,X88) )
      & ( X91 = X93
        | ~ part_of(X94,X90)
        | ~ end_point(X91,X94)
        | ~ end_point(X93,X94)
        | ~ inner_point(X92,X94)
        | between_c(X90,X91,X92,X93) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X99,X100,X101,X102,X103] :
      ( ( incident_o(X99,X100)
        | ~ start_point(X99,X100) )
      & ( X99 = X101
        | ~ incident_o(X101,X100)
        | ordered_by(X100,X99,X101)
        | ~ start_point(X99,X100) )
      & ( X102 != esk15_2(X102,X103)
        | ~ incident_o(X102,X103)
        | start_point(X102,X103) )
      & ( incident_o(esk15_2(X102,X103),X103)
        | ~ incident_o(X102,X103)
        | start_point(X102,X103) )
      & ( ~ ordered_by(X103,X102,esk15_2(X102,X103))
        | ~ incident_o(X102,X103)
        | start_point(X102,X103) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( start_point(esk26_0,esk25_0)
    & start_point(esk27_0,esk25_0)
    & esk26_0 != esk27_0 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ between_c(X3,X1,X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X118,X119,X120,X121,X123,X124,X125,X126,X127,X128,X129] :
      ( ( ~ incident_o(X123,X121)
        | incident_c(X123,esk18_4(X118,X119,X120,X121))
        | ~ between_o(X121,X118,X119,X120) )
      & ( ~ incident_c(X124,esk18_4(X118,X119,X120,X121))
        | incident_o(X124,X121)
        | ~ between_o(X121,X118,X119,X120) )
      & ( between_c(esk18_4(X118,X119,X120,X121),X118,X119,X120)
        | ~ between_o(X121,X118,X119,X120) )
      & ( ~ incident_o(esk19_5(X125,X126,X127,X128,X129),X128)
        | ~ incident_c(esk19_5(X125,X126,X127,X128,X129),X129)
        | ~ between_c(X129,X125,X126,X127)
        | between_o(X128,X125,X126,X127) )
      & ( incident_o(esk19_5(X125,X126,X127,X128,X129),X128)
        | incident_c(esk19_5(X125,X126,X127,X128,X129),X129)
        | ~ between_c(X129,X125,X126,X127)
        | between_o(X128,X125,X126,X127) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[o3])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( incident_o(X1,X2)
    | ~ start_point(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    start_point(esk27_0,esk25_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ between_c(X1,X2,X3,X2),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( between_c(esk18_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ between_o(X4,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X95,X96,X97,X98] :
      ( ( ordered_by(X95,X98,X97)
        | ordered_by(X95,X96,X97)
        | ~ between_o(X95,X96,X97,X98) )
      & ( ordered_by(X95,X97,X96)
        | ordered_by(X95,X96,X97)
        | ~ between_o(X95,X96,X97,X98) )
      & ( ordered_by(X95,X98,X97)
        | ordered_by(X95,X97,X98)
        | ~ between_o(X95,X96,X97,X98) )
      & ( ordered_by(X95,X97,X96)
        | ordered_by(X95,X97,X98)
        | ~ between_o(X95,X96,X97,X98) )
      & ( ~ ordered_by(X95,X96,X97)
        | ~ ordered_by(X95,X97,X98)
        | between_o(X95,X96,X97,X98) )
      & ( ~ ordered_by(X95,X98,X97)
        | ~ ordered_by(X95,X97,X96)
        | between_o(X95,X96,X97,X98) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[between_o_defn])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ordered_by(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ incident_o(X2,X3)
    | ~ start_point(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    incident_o(esk27_0,esk25_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    start_point(esk26_0,esk25_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ between_o(X1,X2,X3,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( between_o(X1,X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ ordered_by(X1,X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk27_0
    | ordered_by(esk25_0,X1,esk27_0)
    | ~ start_point(X1,esk25_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    esk26_0 != esk27_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    incident_o(esk26_0,esk25_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ ordered_by(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ordered_by(esk25_0,esk26_0,esk27_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_20]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk26_0
    | ordered_by(esk25_0,X1,esk26_0)
    | ~ start_point(X1,esk25_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordered_by(esk25_0,esk27_0,esk26_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_14]),c_0_24]),c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem    : GEO124+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 09:40:24 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kbPx8f9qDG/E---3.1_12723.p
% 0.15/0.43  # Version: 3.2.0
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12801 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43  # Search class: FGHSS-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 511s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 248s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 241s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12811 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43  # Search class: FGHSS-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 511s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 248s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 241s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 28
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 88
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 88
% 0.15/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 200
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.15/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 197
% 0.15/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 0.15/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 286
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 255
% 0.15/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 269
% 0.15/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 10
% 0.15/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.15/0.43  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 7
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 102
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.15/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 87
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 231
% 0.15/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 974
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 88
% 0.15/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2979
% 0.15/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1284
% 0.15/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.15/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 212
% 0.15/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 17
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10680
% 0.15/0.43  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1942
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1972 pages
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.055 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.064 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.15/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------