TSTP Solution File: GEO118-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO118-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.22s 3.40s
% Output : Refutation 3.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : GEO118-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 18:24:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Fri Jun 17 18:24:08 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12267.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 115 during input processing: 0 [copy,115,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36 115 back subsumes 103.
% 0.12/0.36 115 back subsumes 102.
% 0.12/0.36 115 back subsumes 101.
% 0.12/0.36 115 back subsumes 98.
% 0.12/0.36 115 back subsumes 97.
% 0.12/0.36 115 back subsumes 91.
% 0.12/0.36 115 back subsumes 90.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.84/1.05 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.84/1.05 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.84/1.05 number of clauses in intial UL: 91
% 0.84/1.05 number of clauses initially in problem: 107
% 0.84/1.05 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.84/1.05 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 86
% 0.84/1.05 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.84/1.05 absolute distinct symbol count: 43
% 0.84/1.05 distinct predicate count: 14
% 0.84/1.05 distinct function count: 26
% 0.84/1.05 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.84/1.05
% 0.84/1.05 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 -------- PROOF --------
% 3.22/3.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.22/3.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Model 2 [ 4 32 197436 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Model 3 [ 8 4 17010 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Model 4 [ 8 4 21739 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Model 5 [ 9 8 56666 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Model 6 [ 7 12 87042 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Model 7 [ 9 8 54636 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 3.02 sec ----> 1385 [hyper,1053,42,115] {-} $F.
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.22/3.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.22/3.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 42 [] {+} -between_c(A,B,C,D)|B!=D.
% 3.22/3.40 53 [] {+} -ordered_by(A,B,C)| -ordered_by(A,C,D)|between_o(A,D,C,B).
% 3.22/3.40 72 [] {+} -between_o(A,B,C,D)|between_c(ax2_sk4(A,D,C,B),B,C,D).
% 3.22/3.40 113 [] {+} ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27).
% 3.22/3.40 114 [] {+} ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26).
% 3.22/3.40 115 [] {+} A=A.
% 3.22/3.40 826 [hyper,114,53,113] {-} between_o(sk25,sk26,sk27,sk26).
% 3.22/3.40 1053 [hyper,826,72] {-} between_c(ax2_sk4(sk25,sk26,sk27,sk26),sk26,sk27,sk26).
% 3.22/3.40 1385 [hyper,1053,42,115] {-} $F.
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.22/3.40 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 ============ end of search ============
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 true clauses given 3 (20.0%)
% 3.22/3.40 false clauses given 12
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 FALSE TRUE
% 3.22/3.40 3 0 1
% 3.22/3.40 4 0 2
% 3.22/3.40 5 0 4
% 3.22/3.40 6 0 4
% 3.22/3.40 7 0 2
% 3.22/3.40 8 0 8
% 3.22/3.40 9 1 8
% 3.22/3.40 10 0 16
% 3.22/3.40 11 3 8
% 3.22/3.40 12 9 12
% 3.22/3.40 13 20 11
% 3.22/3.40 14 7 18
% 3.22/3.40 15 25 25
% 3.22/3.40 16 6 11
% 3.22/3.40 17 10 19
% 3.22/3.40 18 22 32
% 3.22/3.40 19 57 46
% 3.22/3.40 20 39 44
% 3.22/3.40 21 7 33
% 3.22/3.40 22 12 46
% 3.22/3.40 23 33 5
% 3.22/3.40 24 6 8
% 3.22/3.40 25 33 9
% 3.22/3.40 26 7 10
% 3.22/3.40 27 13 4
% 3.22/3.40 28 9 0
% 3.22/3.40 29 23 14
% 3.22/3.40 30 0 16
% 3.22/3.40 31 23 18
% 3.22/3.40 32 5 8
% 3.22/3.40 33 3 5
% 3.22/3.40 34 17 11
% 3.22/3.40 35 12 23
% 3.22/3.40 36 0 25
% 3.22/3.40 37 16 64
% 3.22/3.40 38 1 12
% 3.22/3.40 39 15 11
% 3.22/3.40 40 12 23
% 3.22/3.40 41 1 9
% 3.22/3.40 42 6 15
% 3.22/3.40 43 9 31
% 3.22/3.40 44 0 19
% 3.22/3.40 45 0 15
% 3.22/3.40 46 6 39
% 3.22/3.40 47 3 2
% 3.22/3.40 48 0 2
% 3.22/3.40 49 6 10
% 3.22/3.40 50 0 2
% 3.22/3.40 51 0 9
% 3.22/3.40 52 0 11
% 3.22/3.40 55 0 2
% 3.22/3.40 56 0 2
% 3.22/3.40 tot: 477 784 (62.2% true)
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Model 7 [ 9 -15 54636 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.22/3.40
% 3.22/3.40 Process 12267 finished Fri Jun 17 18:24:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------