TSTP Solution File: GEO118+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO118+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.72s 2.92s
% Output   : Refutation 2.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : GEO118+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:10:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.38  The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.38  Sat Jun 18 03:10:23 2022
% 0.13/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 17687.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.38  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.38  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.38  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 115 during input processing: 0 [copy,115,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.38  115 back subsumes 103.
% 0.13/0.38  115 back subsumes 102.
% 0.13/0.38  115 back subsumes 101.
% 0.13/0.38  115 back subsumes 98.
% 0.13/0.38  115 back subsumes 97.
% 0.13/0.38  115 back subsumes 91.
% 0.13/0.38  115 back subsumes 90.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.90/1.10  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.90/1.10  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.90/1.10  number of clauses in intial UL: 91
% 0.90/1.10  number of clauses initially in problem: 107
% 0.90/1.10  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.90/1.10  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 86
% 0.90/1.10  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.90/1.10  absolute distinct symbol count: 43
% 0.90/1.10     distinct predicate count: 14
% 0.90/1.10     distinct function count: 26
% 0.90/1.10     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.72/2.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.72/2.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Model 2 [ 4 16 106292 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Model 3 [ 4 23 131489 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Model 4 [ 10 7 41950 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Model 5 [ 8 9 55316 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Model 6 [ 10 7 50243 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   2.51 sec ----> 1344 [hyper,1053,42,115] {-} $F.
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.72/2.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.72/2.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  42 [] {+} -between_c(A,B,C,D)|B!=D.
% 2.72/2.92  53 [] {+} between_o(A,B,C,D)| -ordered_by(A,D,C)| -ordered_by(A,C,B).
% 2.72/2.92  72 [] {+} -between_o(A,B,C,D)|between_c($f18(B,C,D,A),B,C,D).
% 2.72/2.92  113 [] {+} ordered_by($c3,$c2,$c1).
% 2.72/2.92  114 [] {+} ordered_by($c3,$c1,$c2).
% 2.72/2.92  115 [] {+} A=A.
% 2.72/2.92  826 [hyper,114,53,113] {-} between_o($c3,$c2,$c1,$c2).
% 2.72/2.92  1053 [hyper,826,72] {-} between_c($f18($c2,$c1,$c2,$c3),$c2,$c1,$c2).
% 2.72/2.92  1344 [hyper,1053,42,115] {-} $F.
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.72/2.92  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  ============ end of search ============
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  true clauses given           3      (21.4%)
% 2.72/2.92  false clauses given         11
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.72/2.92     3  0         1
% 2.72/2.92     4  0         3
% 2.72/2.92     5  0         2
% 2.72/2.92     6  0         4
% 2.72/2.92     7  0         2
% 2.72/2.92     8  0         6
% 2.72/2.92     9  1         8
% 2.72/2.92    10  0         14
% 2.72/2.92    11  2         9
% 2.72/2.92    12  6         15
% 2.72/2.92    13  17        14
% 2.72/2.92    14  8         17
% 2.72/2.92    15  30        16
% 2.72/2.92    16  9         7
% 2.72/2.92    17  6         21
% 2.72/2.92    18  19        35
% 2.72/2.92    19  54        48
% 2.72/2.92    20  50        26
% 2.72/2.92    21  7         32
% 2.72/2.92    22  11        44
% 2.72/2.92    23  30        6
% 2.72/2.92    24  6         7
% 2.72/2.92    25  33        9
% 2.72/2.92    26  5         12
% 2.72/2.92    27  12        4
% 2.72/2.92    28  9         0
% 2.72/2.92    29  18        19
% 2.72/2.92    30  0         16
% 2.72/2.92    31  26        15
% 2.72/2.92    32  5         8
% 2.72/2.92    33  6         2
% 2.72/2.92    34  17        11
% 2.72/2.92    35  12        23
% 2.72/2.92    36  0         25
% 2.72/2.92    37  18        56
% 2.72/2.92    38  1         12
% 2.72/2.92    39  18        8
% 2.72/2.92    40  12        23
% 2.72/2.92    41  0         10
% 2.72/2.92    42  6         15
% 2.72/2.92    43  12        28
% 2.72/2.92    44  0         13
% 2.72/2.92    45  0         15
% 2.72/2.92    46  6         39
% 2.72/2.92    47  3         2
% 2.72/2.92    48  0         2
% 2.72/2.92    49  6         10
% 2.72/2.92    50  0         2
% 2.72/2.92    51  0         9
% 2.72/2.92    52  0         11
% 2.72/2.92    55  0         2
% 2.72/2.92    56  0         2
% 2.72/2.92  tot:  481       740      (60.6% true)
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Model 6 [ 10 -14 50243 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.72/2.92  
% 2.72/2.92  Process 17687 finished Sat Jun 18 03:10:25 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------