TSTP Solution File: GEO118+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO118+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.99s 2.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 2 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ between_c(X3,X1,X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qp18xajs/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_57,plain,
( between_c(esk14_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between_o(X4,X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qp18xajs/input.p',i_0_57) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( between_o(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qp18xajs/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_82,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(esk24_0,esk26_0,esk25_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qp18xajs/input.p',i_0_82) ).
cnf(i_0_83,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(esk24_0,esk25_0,esk26_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qp18xajs/input.p',i_0_83) ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ between_c(X3,X1,X4,X2) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
~ between_c(X1,X2,X3,X2),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_89]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
( between_c(esk14_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between_o(X4,X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_57 ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
~ between_o(X1,X2,X3,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_91]) ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
( between_o(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X4,X3) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ ordered_by(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_93]) ).
cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(esk24_0,esk26_0,esk25_0),
i_0_82 ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(esk24_0,esk25_0,esk26_0),
i_0_83 ).
cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),c_0_96])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO118+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:19:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.99/2.53 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.99/2.53 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.99/2.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 7.99/2.53
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof found!
% 7.99/2.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.99/2.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 7.99/2.53 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 7.99/2.53 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.99/2.53 # Parsed axioms : 87
% 7.99/2.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Initial clauses : 87
% 7.99/2.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 87
% 7.99/2.53 # Processed clauses : 97
% 7.99/2.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # ...subsumed : 1
% 7.99/2.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 96
% 7.99/2.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 7.99/2.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Generated clauses : 172
% 7.99/2.53 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 140
% 7.99/2.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 7.99/2.53 # Paramodulations : 155
% 7.99/2.53 # Factorizations : 10
% 7.99/2.53 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 7.99/2.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 95
% 7.99/2.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 7.99/2.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 7.99/2.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 84
% 7.99/2.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 129
% 7.99/2.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 574
% 7.99/2.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1451
% 7.99/2.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 560
% 7.99/2.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 7.99/2.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 204
% 7.99/2.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.99/2.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4083
% 7.99/2.53
% 7.99/2.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.99/2.53 # User time : 0.024 s
% 7.99/2.53 # System time : 0.002 s
% 7.99/2.53 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 7.99/2.53 # ...preprocessing : 0.019 s
% 7.99/2.53 # ...main loop : 0.007 s
% 7.99/2.53 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.99/2.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------