TSTP Solution File: GEO104+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO104+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 31.82s 32.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : GEO104+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 17:33:08 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.39 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.39 Sat Jun 18 17:33:08 2022
% 0.14/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 30286.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [copy,65,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.39 65 back subsumes 54.
% 0.14/0.39 65 back subsumes 53.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 49
% 0.22/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 64
% 0.22/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 76
% 0.22/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 88
% 0.22/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.22/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 26
% 0.22/0.44 distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.22/0.44 distinct function count: 14
% 0.22/0.44 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Changing weight limit from 60 to 39.
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 4 [ 5 4 35579 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 5 [ 5 1 4621 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 6 [ 7 0 2125 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 7 [ 6 1 7815 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 8 [ 8 1 6880 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 9 [ 7 1 15940 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 10 [ 6 1 882 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 11 [ 9 1 9214 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 12 [ 8 1 7669 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 13 [ 10 2 13475 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 14 [ 12 1 6790 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 15 [ 18 1 3989 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 16 [ 16 1 255 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 17 [ 4 1 6138 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 18 [ 15 2 18290 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 19 [ 23 1 12546 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 20 [ 24 1 7188 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 21 [ 16 2 16417 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 22 [ 29 1 7385 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 23 [ 17 2 19165 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 24 [ 32 1 6556 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 25 [ 19 0 5827 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 26 [ 33 1 11967 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 27 [ 17 3 30939 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 28 [ 19 1 2150 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 29 [ 35 1 11445 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 30 [ 38 1 5046 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 31 [ 28 8 125740 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 32 [ 41 1 7593 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 33 [ 42 1 5466 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 34 [ 23 2 22619 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Model 35 [ 41 1 4430 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82
% 12.63/12.82 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 80 givens.
% 12.63/12.82
% 13.17/13.36
% 13.17/13.36
% 13.17/13.36 Changing weight limit from 39 to 30.
% 13.17/13.36
% 13.17/13.36 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 85 givens.
% 13.17/13.36
% 13.47/13.68
% 13.47/13.68
% 13.47/13.68 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 13.47/13.68
% 13.47/13.68 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 90 givens.
% 13.47/13.68
% 14.01/14.22
% 14.01/14.22
% 14.01/14.22 Changing weight limit from 29 to 26.
% 14.01/14.22
% 14.01/14.22 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 95 givens.
% 14.01/14.22
% 15.92/16.09
% 15.92/16.09
% 15.92/16.09 Changing weight limit from 26 to 24.
% 15.92/16.09
% 15.92/16.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.92/16.09
% 15.92/16.09 Model 36 [ 41 3 34858 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 15.92/16.09
% 15.92/16.09 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 100 givens.
% 15.92/16.09
% 19.27/19.48
% 19.27/19.48
% 19.27/19.48 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 19.27/19.48
% 19.27/19.48 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.27/19.48
% 19.27/19.48 Model 37 [ 30 1 6295 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 19.27/19.48
% 19.27/19.48 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.27/19.48
% 19.27/19.48 Model 38 [ 47 1 6911 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 19.27/19.48
% 19.27/19.48 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 125 givens.
% 19.27/19.48
% 19.56/19.80
% 19.56/19.80
% 19.56/19.80 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 19.56/19.80
% 19.56/19.80 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 130 givens.
% 19.56/19.80
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Model 39 [ 31 1 4688 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Model 40 [ 43 1 3885 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Model 41 [ 40 1 5075 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Model 42 [ 46 1 6871 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.05/27.24 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 245 givens.
% 27.05/27.24
% 27.91/28.09
% 27.91/28.09
% 27.91/28.09 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 27.91/28.09
% 27.91/28.09 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 275 givens.
% 27.91/28.09
% 30.06/30.29
% 30.06/30.29
% 30.06/30.29 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 30.06/30.29
% 30.06/30.29 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 30.06/30.29
% 30.06/30.29 Model 43 [ 45 1 10557 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 30.06/30.29
% 30.06/30.29 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 30.06/30.29
% 30.06/30.29 Model 44 [ 45 30 245418 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 30.06/30.29
% 30.06/30.29 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 405 givens.
% 30.06/30.29
% 30.98/31.20
% 30.98/31.20
% 30.98/31.20 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 30.98/31.20
% 30.98/31.20 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 30.98/31.20
% 30.98/31.20
% 30.98/31.20 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 480 givens.
% 30.98/31.20
% 31.82/32.02 incident_c($f1($c2,sum(A,A)),$c3).
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 31.82/32.02 284 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 9069.1 K.
% 31.82/32.02 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 31.82/32.02 sym_ent ( 304) 143 0 143 0 42.5 K
% 31.82/32.02 term ( 32) 17390543 17366408 24135 7003 973.1 K
% 31.82/32.02 rel ( 40) 13923833 13880325 43508 10776 2120.5 K
% 31.82/32.02 term_ptr ( 16) 1238721 1137590 101131 79513 2822.6 K
% 31.82/32.02 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 31.82/32.02 fpa_head ( 24) 11567 7130 4437 266 110.2 K
% 31.82/32.02 fpa_tree ( 56) 467896 467896 0 457 25.0 K
% 31.82/32.02 context (1288) 1670455 1670455 0 8 10.1 K
% 31.82/32.02 trail ( 24) 8558800 8558800 0 12 0.3 K
% 31.82/32.02 imd_tree ( 32) 19 0 19 0 0.6 K
% 31.82/32.02 imd_pos (4024) 7348 7348 0 4 15.7 K
% 31.82/32.02 is_tree ( 24) 51513 41756 9757 7680 408.7 K
% 31.82/32.02 is_pos (2424) 22313401 22313401 0 16 37.9 K
% 31.82/32.02 fsub_pos ( 16) 1350145 1350145 0 1 0.0 K
% 31.82/32.02 literal ( 32) 3428293 3408680 19613 3609 725.7 K
% 31.82/32.02 clause ( 88) 619465 612107 7358 15 633.6 K
% 31.82/32.02 list ( 272) 28 21 7 2 2.4 K
% 31.82/32.02 clash_nd ( 80) 17087 17087 0 5 0.4 K
% 31.82/32.02 clause_ptr ( 16) 29199 21890 7309 429 120.9 K
% 31.82/32.02 int_ptr ( 16) 1876252 1826140 50112 72 784.1 K
% 31.82/32.02 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 31.82/32.02 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 31.82/32.02 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 31.82/32.02 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 31.82/32.02 formula( 40) 450 450 0 202 7.9 K
% 31.82/32.02 formula_ptr( 16) 18 18 0 18 0.3 K
% 31.82/32.02 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 31.82/32.02 e 0.00
% 31.82/32.02 back subsume 0.00
% 31.82/32.02 factor time 0.00
% 31.82/32.02 FINDER time 0.00
% 31.82/32.02 unindex time 0.00
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 true clauses given 142 (27.6%)
% 31.82/32.02 false clauses given 373
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 FALSE TRUE
% 31.82/32.02 7 0 4
% 31.82/32.02 8 0 79
% 31.82/32.02 9 4 90
% 31.82/32.02 10 5 186
% 31.82/32.02 11 199 192
% 31.82/32.02 12 234 354
% 31.82/32.02 13 412 359
% 31.82/32.02 14 322 706
% 31.82/32.02 15 590 624
% 31.82/32.02 16 302 0
% 31.82/32.02 17 465 9
% 31.82/32.02 18 175 16
% 31.82/32.02 tot: 2708 2619 (49.2% true)
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 Model 44 [ 45 30 245418 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 31.82/32.02 1:0 2:9 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:12 7:12 8:0 9:0 10:7
% 31.82/32.02 11:7 12:4 13:4 14:8 15:8 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 31.82/32.02 21:0 22:0 23:7 24:7 25:42 26:0 27:17 28:0 29:4 30:0
% 31.82/32.02 31:8 32:0 33:13 34:1866 35:6 36:0 37:5 38:0 39:0 40:4
% 31.82/32.02 41:22 42:63 43:46 44:37 45:0 46:33 47:33 48:2 49:1 50:8
% 31.82/32.02 51:54 52:20 53:5 54:0 55:2301 56:89 57:23 58:24 59:96 60:1891
% 31.82/32.02 61:2005 62:131 63:100 64:993 65:9036 66:32 67:31 68:87 69:68 70:281
% 31.82/32.02 71:272 72:14 73:33 74:425 75:188 76:444 77:42 78:92 79:96 80:121
% 31.82/32.02 81:91 82:6 83:120 84:1605 85:217 86:26 87:97 88:7 89:60 90:60
% 31.82/32.02 91:14 92:14 93:17 94:9 95:7 96:19 97:13 98:13 99:0
% 31.82/32.02 All others: 36036.
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 31.82/32.02
% 31.82/32.02 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------