TSTP Solution File: GEO093+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GEO093+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:03:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  161 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  154 (  49   ~;  77   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  116 (  19 sgn  37   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(proposition_2_14_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X4,X3] :
      ( ( open(X1)
        & part_of(X2,X1)
        & part_of(X4,X1)
        & meet(X3,X2,X4) )
     => open(sum(X2,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',proposition_2_14_2) ).

fof(sum_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X4] :
      ( X1 = sum(X2,X4)
    <=> ! [X5] :
          ( incident_c(X5,X1)
        <=> ( incident_c(X5,X2)
            | incident_c(X5,X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',sum_defn) ).

fof(part_of_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( part_of(X2,X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( incident_c(X3,X2)
         => incident_c(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',part_of_defn) ).

fof(c9,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( incident_c(X3,X1)
        <=> incident_c(X3,X2) )
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',c9) ).

fof(c1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( part_of(X2,X1)
        & X2 != X1 )
     => open(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',c1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X3] :
        ( ( open(X1)
          & part_of(X2,X1)
          & part_of(X4,X1)
          & meet(X3,X2,X4) )
       => open(sum(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[proposition_2_14_2]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X9,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ incident_c(X9,X6)
        | incident_c(X9,X7)
        | incident_c(X9,X8)
        | X6 != sum(X7,X8) )
      & ( ~ incident_c(X9,X7)
        | incident_c(X9,X6)
        | X6 != sum(X7,X8) )
      & ( ~ incident_c(X9,X8)
        | incident_c(X9,X6)
        | X6 != sum(X7,X8) )
      & ( ~ incident_c(esk6_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
        | ~ incident_c(esk6_3(X6,X7,X8),X6)
        | X6 = sum(X7,X8) )
      & ( ~ incident_c(esk6_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | ~ incident_c(esk6_3(X6,X7,X8),X6)
        | X6 = sum(X7,X8) )
      & ( incident_c(esk6_3(X6,X7,X8),X6)
        | incident_c(esk6_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
        | incident_c(esk6_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | X6 = sum(X7,X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ part_of(X5,X4)
        | ~ incident_c(X6,X5)
        | incident_c(X6,X4) )
      & ( incident_c(esk9_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | part_of(X5,X4) )
      & ( ~ incident_c(esk9_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | part_of(X5,X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[part_of_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( open(esk1_0)
    & part_of(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & part_of(esk3_0,esk1_0)
    & meet(esk4_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & ~ open(sum(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( incident_c(X4,X1)
    | X1 != sum(X2,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( incident_c(X1,X2)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,X3)
    | ~ part_of(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( part_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ incident_c(esk9_2(X2,X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( incident_c(X1,sum(X2,X3))
    | ~ incident_c(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( part_of(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(esk9_2(X2,X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X1 = sum(X2,X3)
    | incident_c(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | incident_c(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | incident_c(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( incident_c(X4,X1)
    | X1 != sum(X2,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ incident_c(esk13_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | X4 = X5 )
      & ( incident_c(esk13_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | incident_c(esk13_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | X4 = X5 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c9])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( part_of(X1,sum(X2,X3))
    | ~ incident_c(esk9_2(sum(X2,X3),X1),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(esk9_2(X1,esk3_0),esk1_0)
    | part_of(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = sum(X2,esk3_0)
    | incident_c(esk6_3(X1,X2,esk3_0),esk1_0)
    | incident_c(esk6_3(X1,X2,esk3_0),X2)
    | incident_c(esk6_3(X1,X2,esk3_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( incident_c(X1,sum(X2,X3))
    | ~ incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(esk3_0,sum(X1,esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = sum(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | incident_c(esk6_3(X1,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0)
    | incident_c(esk6_3(X1,esk1_0,esk3_0),X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ part_of(X4,X3)
      | X4 = X3
      | open(X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( part_of(X1,sum(X2,X3))
    | ~ incident_c(esk9_2(sum(X2,X3),X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( X1 = sum(X2,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(X1,sum(X2,X3)),X1)
    | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(X1,sum(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(X1,sum(X2,esk1_0))
    | ~ incident_c(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( X1 = sum(X2,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X1)
    | ~ incident_c(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(esk1_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0
    | incident_c(esk6_3(esk1_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( open(X1)
    | X1 = X2
    | ~ part_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    part_of(X1,sum(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    part_of(X1,sum(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(X1,esk1_0) = sum(X2,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(sum(X1,esk1_0),sum(X2,X3)),esk3_0)
    | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(sum(X1,esk1_0),sum(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    sum(esk1_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ open(sum(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( sum(X1,X2) = X1
    | open(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( incident_c(X4,X3)
    | incident_c(X4,X2)
    | X1 != sum(X2,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( sum(X1,X2) = X2
    | open(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(X1,esk1_0) = esk1_0
    | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(sum(X1,esk1_0),esk1_0),esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    sum(sum(esk2_0,esk3_0),X1) = sum(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( incident_c(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,sum(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | incident_c(esk13_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | incident_c(esk13_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    sum(X1,sum(esk2_0,esk3_0)) = sum(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0
    | ~ incident_c(esk13_2(sum(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk1_0),esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( sum(X1,X2) = X3
    | incident_c(esk13_2(sum(X1,X2),X3),X3)
    | incident_c(esk13_2(sum(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | incident_c(esk13_2(sum(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(X1,sum(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( sum(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0
    | incident_c(esk13_2(sum(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk1_0),esk1_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = X2
    | incident_c(esk13_2(X1,X2),sum(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_44]),c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    sum(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_51]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    open(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_53]),c_0_54])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : GEO093+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:49:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.40  
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 56
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 45
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 26
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 23
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 15
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 29
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 0.23/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.23/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.23/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 39
% 0.23/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 39
% 0.23/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 1561
% 0.23/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 19
% 0.23/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 908
% 0.23/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 634
% 0.23/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 125
% 0.23/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 73
% 0.23/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 83
% 0.23/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 28770
% 0.23/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 26867
% 0.23/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 702
% 0.23/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 28333
% 0.23/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 300
% 0.23/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 137
% 0.23/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 478
% 0.23/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 28
% 0.23/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.23/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 450
% 0.23/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20018
% 0.23/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 131105
% 0.23/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 156
% 0.23/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 72096
% 0.23/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20617
% 0.23/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1654
% 0.23/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 624
% 0.23/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 66
% 0.23/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 17
% 0.23/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 698538
% 0.23/1.40  
% 0.23/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.40  # User time                : 0.628 s
% 0.23/1.40  # System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.40  # Total time               : 0.647 s
% 0.23/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 28888 pages
% 0.23/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------