TSTP Solution File: GEO087-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : GEO087-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:13:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 0.59s
% Output : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(part_of_defn_1,axiom,
( ~ part_of(X,Y)
| ~ incident_c(Z,X)
| incident_c(Z,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_1) ).
cnf(inner_point_defn_21,axiom,
( ~ inner_point(X,Y)
| incident_c(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',inner_point_defn_21) ).
cnf(inner_point_defn_22,axiom,
( ~ inner_point(X,Y)
| ~ end_point(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',inner_point_defn_22) ).
cnf(meet_defn_26,axiom,
( ~ meet(X,Y,Z)
| ~ incident_c(U,Y)
| ~ incident_c(U,Z)
| end_point(U,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',meet_defn_26) ).
cnf(c3_37,axiom,
inner_point(ax0_sk8(X),X),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',c3_37) ).
cnf(corollary_2_9_67,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk14,sk15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_2_9_67) ).
cnf(corollary_2_9_68,negated_conjecture,
meet(sk16,sk14,sk15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_2_9_68) ).
cnf(46,plain,
incident_c(ax0_sk8(X),X),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[inner_point_defn_21,c3_37]) ).
cnf(47,plain,
~ end_point(ax0_sk8(X),X),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[inner_point_defn_22,c3_37]) ).
cnf(164,plain,
incident_c(ax0_sk8(sk14),sk15),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[part_of_defn_1,46,corollary_2_9_67]) ).
cnf(185,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meet_defn_26,47,corollary_2_9_68,46]),164]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO087-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:33:59 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.49 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 "."
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T07:33:59
% 0.21/0.49 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-06-18T07:33:59
% 0.44/0.59
% 0.44/0.59
% 0.44/0.59 #||
% 0.44/0.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.59 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.59 ||#
% 0.44/0.59
% 0.44/0.59 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.44/0.59 ; 429 formulas have been input or derived (from 56 formulas).
% 0.44/0.59 ; 185 (43%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.44/0.59 ; 17 ( 9%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.44/0.59 ; 168 (91%) are still being kept.
% 0.44/0.59 ;
% 0.44/0.59 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.011 11% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.002 2% Assert (50 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.019 18% Process new row (318 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.019 18% Resolution (110 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (55 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (4 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.006 6% Condensing (196 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.011 11% Forward subsumption (196 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.003 3% Backward subsumption (139 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.002 2% Clause clause subsumption (544 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.005 5% Forward simplification (318 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.001 1% Backward simplification (185 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.002 2% Ordering (993 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.023 22% Other
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.104 Total
% 0.44/0.59 ; 0.105 Real time
% 0.44/0.59 ;
% 0.44/0.59 ; Term-hash-array has 347 terms in all.
% 0.44/0.60 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 122 entries (126 at peak, 139 added, 17 deleted).
% 0.44/0.60 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 307 nodes (330 at peak, 388 added, 81 deleted).
% 0.44/0.60 ; Retrieved 555 possibly forward subsuming rows in 196 calls.
% 0.44/0.60 ; Retrieved 81 possibly backward subsumed rows in 139 calls.
% 0.44/0.60 ; Path-index has 331 entries (339 at peak, 368 added, 37 deleted).
% 0.44/0.60 ; Path-index has 701 nodes (706 at peak, 754 added, 53 deleted).
% 0.44/0.60 ; Trie-index has 331 entries (339 at peak, 368 added, 37 deleted).
% 0.44/0.60 ; Trie-index has 665 nodes (680 at peak, 759 added, 94 deleted).
% 0.44/0.60 ; Retrieved 198 generalization terms in 780 calls.
% 0.44/0.60 ; Retrieved 71 instance terms in 45 calls.
% 0.44/0.60 ; Retrieved 10,441 unifiable terms in 1,231 calls.
% 0.44/0.60 ;
% 0.44/0.60 ; The agenda of rows to process has 7 entries:
% 0.44/0.60 ; 1 with value 8 2 with value 12 2 with value 14
% 0.44/0.60 ; 2 with value 11
% 0.44/0.60 ; The agenda of rows to give has 112 entries:
% 0.44/0.60 ; 5 with value (4 7) 2 with value (4 19) 3 with value (4 36)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 2 with value (4 8) 3 with value (4 20) 2 with value (4 38)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 4 with value (4 9) 5 with value (4 21) 3 with value (4 39)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 14 with value (4 10) 2 with value (4 23) 7 with value (4 40)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 2 with value (4 11) 4 with value (4 26) 6 with value (4 43)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 3 with value (4 12) 4 with value (4 29) 6 with value (4 46)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 3 with value (4 13) 4 with value (4 31) 1 with value (4 54)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 1 with value (4 14) 3 with value (4 32) 2 with value (4 55)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 6 with value (4 15) 6 with value (4 34) 6 with value (4 56)
% 0.44/0.60 ; 3 with value (4 16)
% 0.44/0.60 Evaluation took:
% 0.44/0.60 0.106 seconds of real time
% 0.44/0.60 0.089001 seconds of user run time
% 0.44/0.60 0.016839 seconds of system run time
% 0.44/0.60 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.44/0.60 0 page faults and
% 0.44/0.60 5,667,272 bytes consed.
% 0.44/0.60 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.44/0.60 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T07:33:59
% 0.44/0.60 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.44/0.60 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------