TSTP Solution File: GEO087-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO087-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(inner_point_defn_22,axiom,
( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
| ~ end_point(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFy9ylYvI5/E---3.1_6167.p',inner_point_defn_22) ).
cnf(c3_37,axiom,
inner_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFy9ylYvI5/E---3.1_6167.p',c3_37) ).
cnf(meet_defn_26,axiom,
( end_point(X4,X2)
| ~ meet(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFy9ylYvI5/E---3.1_6167.p',meet_defn_26) ).
cnf(corollary_2_9_68,negated_conjecture,
meet(sk16,sk14,sk15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFy9ylYvI5/E---3.1_6167.p',corollary_2_9_68) ).
cnf(inner_point_defn_21,axiom,
( incident_c(X1,X2)
| ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFy9ylYvI5/E---3.1_6167.p',inner_point_defn_21) ).
cnf(part_of_defn_1,axiom,
( incident_c(X3,X2)
| ~ part_of(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFy9ylYvI5/E---3.1_6167.p',part_of_defn_1) ).
cnf(corollary_2_9_67,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk14,sk15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFy9ylYvI5/E---3.1_6167.p',corollary_2_9_67) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
| ~ end_point(X1,X2) ),
inner_point_defn_22 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
inner_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
c3_37 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( end_point(X4,X2)
| ~ meet(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X3) ),
meet_defn_26 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
meet(sk16,sk14,sk15),
corollary_2_9_68 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( incident_c(X1,X2)
| ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
inner_point_defn_21 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ end_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( end_point(X1,sk14)
| ~ incident_c(X1,sk15)
| ~ incident_c(X1,sk14) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
incident_c(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( incident_c(X3,X2)
| ~ part_of(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X3,X1) ),
part_of_defn_1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ incident_c(ax0_sk8(sk14),sk15),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( incident_c(ax0_sk8(X1),X2)
| ~ part_of(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk14,sk15),
corollary_2_9_67 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : GEO087-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:43:53 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFy9ylYvI5/E---3.1_6167.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 6244 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 756s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 162s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 158s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6255 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 756s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 162s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 158s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 50
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 45
% 0.16/0.45 # Processed clauses : 159
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.16/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 153
% 0.16/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.16/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.16/0.45 # Generated clauses : 278
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 246
% 0.16/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Paramodulations : 272
% 0.16/0.45 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.16/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.16/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 21
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 102
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 84
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 173
% 0.16/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 604
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 47
% 0.16/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1710
% 0.16/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 964
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.16/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 104
% 0.16/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5386
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.051 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.062 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.16/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------