TSTP Solution File: GEO086-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO086-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 8 unt; 2 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 3 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c1_35,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| open(X1)
| ~ part_of(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i0UYN1tpvi/E---3.1_11951.p',c1_35) ).
cnf(theorem_2_7_2_68,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk15,sk14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i0UYN1tpvi/E---3.1_11951.p',theorem_2_7_2_68) ).
cnf(theorem_2_7_2_69,negated_conjecture,
~ open(sk15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i0UYN1tpvi/E---3.1_11951.p',theorem_2_7_2_69) ).
cnf(theorem_2_7_2_67,negated_conjecture,
open(sk14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i0UYN1tpvi/E---3.1_11951.p',theorem_2_7_2_67) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| open(X1)
| ~ part_of(X1,X2) ),
c1_35 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk15,sk14),
theorem_2_7_2_68 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ open(sk15),
theorem_2_7_2_69 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
open(sk14),
theorem_2_7_2_67 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
sk14 = sk15,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10 % Problem : GEO086-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:29:50 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i0UYN1tpvi/E---3.1_11951.p
% 0.17/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # new_bool_1 with pid 12030 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12033 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 51
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 41
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.17/0.44 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.17/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.17/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 30
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.17/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 52
% 0.17/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 680
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.17/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------