TSTP Solution File: GEO086+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO086+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.51s 2.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   8 unt;   2 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   3 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | open(X1)
    | ~ part_of(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rufhwaro/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(esk15_0,esk14_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rufhwaro/input.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(i_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ open(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rufhwaro/input.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    open(esk14_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rufhwaro/input.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | open(X1)
    | ~ part_of(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(esk15_0,esk14_0),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ open(esk15_0),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    open(esk14_0),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    esk14_0 = esk15_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_53]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GEO086+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:33:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.47  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.51/2.52  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 8.51/2.52  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.51/2.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 8.51/2.52  
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof found!
% 8.51/2.52  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.51/2.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 8.51/2.52  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 8.51/2.52  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.51/2.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 46
% 8.51/2.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Initial clauses                      : 46
% 8.51/2.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 46
% 8.51/2.52  # Processed clauses                    : 49
% 8.51/2.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 49
% 8.51/2.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 8.51/2.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 8.51/2.52  # Generated clauses                    : 63
% 8.51/2.52  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 52
% 8.51/2.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Paramodulations                      : 49
% 8.51/2.52  # Factorizations                       : 8
% 8.51/2.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 8.51/2.52  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 47
% 8.51/2.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 8.51/2.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.51/2.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 8.51/2.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 43
% 8.51/2.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 47
% 8.51/2.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 228
% 8.51/2.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 8.51/2.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 327
% 8.51/2.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 124
% 8.51/2.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 8.51/2.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 8.51/2.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 8.51/2.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.51/2.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1890
% 8.51/2.52  
% 8.51/2.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.51/2.52  # User time                : 0.020 s
% 8.51/2.52  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 8.51/2.52  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 8.51/2.52  # ...preprocessing         : 0.019 s
% 8.51/2.52  # ...main loop             : 0.003 s
% 8.51/2.52  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.51/2.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------