TSTP Solution File: GEO086+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO086+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.44s 1.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   29
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (   8 unt;  25 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  12   ~;   9   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   45 (  23   >;  22   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (;  16   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ meet > part_of > inner_point > incident_c > end_point > open > closed > sum > #nlpp > #skF_9 > #skF_7 > #skF_11 > #skF_17 > #skF_6 > #skF_8 > #skF_13 > #skF_16 > #skF_14 > #skF_12 > #skF_10 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_5 > #skF_15 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i > $i ).

tff(closed,type,
    closed: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(inner_point,type,
    inner_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(end_point,type,
    end_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i > $i ).

tff(part_of,type,
    part_of: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(meet,type,
    meet: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(incident_c,type,
    incident_c: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sum,type,
    sum: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(open,type,
    open: $i > $o ).

tff(f_211,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [C,Cpp] :
        ( ( open(C)
          & part_of(Cpp,C) )
       => open(Cpp) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_2_7_2) ).

tff(f_116,axiom,
    ! [C] :
      ( open(C)
    <=> ? [P] : end_point(P,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',open_defn) ).

tff(f_111,axiom,
    ! [C] :
      ( closed(C)
    <=> ~ ? [P] : end_point(P,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',closed_defn) ).

tff(f_123,axiom,
    ! [C,C1] :
      ( ( part_of(C1,C)
        & ( C1 != C ) )
     => open(C1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',c1) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    open('#skF_16'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_211]) ).

tff(c_132,plain,
    ! [C_84] :
      ( end_point('#skF_8'(C_84),C_84)
      | ~ open(C_84) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_116]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    ! [P_31,C_28] :
      ( ~ end_point(P_31,C_28)
      | ~ closed(C_28) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_111]) ).

tff(c_141,plain,
    ! [C_85] :
      ( ~ closed(C_85)
      | ~ open(C_85) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_62]) ).

tff(c_149,plain,
    ~ closed('#skF_16'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_141]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    ~ open('#skF_17'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_211]) ).

tff(c_100,plain,
    part_of('#skF_17','#skF_16'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_211]) ).

tff(c_152,plain,
    ! [C1_91,C_92] :
      ( open(C1_91)
      | ( C_92 = C1_91 )
      | ~ part_of(C1_91,C_92) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_123]) ).

tff(c_155,plain,
    ( open('#skF_17')
    | ( '#skF_17' = '#skF_16' ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_152]) ).

tff(c_158,plain,
    '#skF_17' = '#skF_16',
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_155]) ).

tff(c_117,plain,
    ! [C_81] :
      ( closed(C_81)
      | end_point('#skF_7'(C_81),C_81) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_111]) ).

tff(c_68,plain,
    ! [C_32,P_35] :
      ( open(C_32)
      | ~ end_point(P_35,C_32) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_116]) ).

tff(c_127,plain,
    ! [C_83] :
      ( open(C_83)
      | closed(C_83) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_68]) ).

tff(c_131,plain,
    closed('#skF_17'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_98]) ).

tff(c_159,plain,
    closed('#skF_16'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_158,c_131]) ).

tff(c_163,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_149,c_159]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : GEO086+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 01:07:15 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.44/1.94  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.44/1.94  
% 3.44/1.94  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.65/1.96  
% 3.65/1.96  Inference rules
% 3.65/1.96  ----------------------
% 3.65/1.97  #Ref     : 0
% 3.65/1.97  #Sup     : 10
% 3.65/1.97  #Fact    : 0
% 3.65/1.97  #Define  : 0
% 3.65/1.97  #Split   : 0
% 3.65/1.97  #Chain   : 0
% 3.65/1.97  #Close   : 0
% 3.65/1.97  
% 3.65/1.97  Ordering : KBO
% 3.65/1.97  
% 3.65/1.97  Simplification rules
% 3.65/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.65/1.97  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.65/1.97  #Demod        : 3
% 3.65/1.97  #Tautology    : 3
% 3.65/1.97  #SimpNegUnit  : 2
% 3.65/1.97  #BackRed      : 3
% 3.65/1.97  
% 3.65/1.97  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.65/1.97  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.65/1.97  
% 3.65/1.97  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.65/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.65/1.97  Preprocessing        : 0.59
% 3.65/1.97  Parsing              : 0.30
% 3.65/1.97  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 3.65/1.97  Main loop            : 0.22
% 3.65/1.97  Inferencing          : 0.06
% 3.65/1.97  Reduction            : 0.07
% 3.65/1.97  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 3.65/1.97  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.65/1.97  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.65/1.97  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.65/1.97  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.65/1.97  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.65/1.97  Total                : 0.86
% 3.65/1.97  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.65/1.97  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.65/1.97  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.65/1.97  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------