TSTP Solution File: GEO082-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO082-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:42 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.05s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 10 unt; 9 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 67 ( 21 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(sum_defn_7,axiom,
( incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X1)
| X3 = sum(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p',sum_defn_7) ).
cnf(sum_defn_11,axiom,
( X3 = sum(X2,X1)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p',sum_defn_11) ).
cnf(part_of_defn_1,axiom,
( incident_c(X3,X2)
| ~ part_of(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p',part_of_defn_1) ).
cnf(sum_defn_6,axiom,
( incident_c(X4,X1)
| X1 != sum(X2,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p',sum_defn_6) ).
cnf(part_of_antisymmetry_68,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk15,sk14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p',part_of_antisymmetry_68) ).
cnf(sum_defn_12,axiom,
( X3 = sum(X2,X1)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X1)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p',sum_defn_12) ).
cnf(part_of_antisymmetry_67,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk14,sk15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p',part_of_antisymmetry_67) ).
cnf(part_of_antisymmetry_69,negated_conjecture,
sk14 != sk15,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p',part_of_antisymmetry_69) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X1)
| X3 = sum(X2,X1) ),
sum_defn_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( X3 = sum(X2,X1)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
sum_defn_11 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( sum(X1,X2) = X1
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,X1),X2)
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,X1),X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( incident_c(X3,X2)
| ~ part_of(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X3,X1) ),
part_of_defn_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( sum(X1,X2) = X1
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,X1),X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( incident_c(X4,X1)
| X1 != sum(X2,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X3) ),
sum_defn_6 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( sum(X1,X2) = X1
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,X1),X3)
| ~ part_of(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk15,sk14),
part_of_antisymmetry_68 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( incident_c(X1,sum(X2,X3))
| ~ incident_c(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( sum(X1,sk15) = X1
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(sk15,X1,X1),sk14) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( sum(X1,X2) = sum(X3,X4)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X4,X3,sum(X1,X2)),X3)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X4,X3,sum(X1,X2)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
sum(sk14,sk15) = sk14,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
( X3 = sum(X2,X1)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X1)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
sum_defn_12 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( sum(X1,X2) = X2
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,X2),X2)
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
part_of(sk14,sk15),
part_of_antisymmetry_67 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( sum(X1,X2) = sk14
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,sk14),sk15)
| ~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,sk14),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( sum(X1,X2) = X2
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(X2,X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( sum(X1,sk14) = X1
| incident_c(ax0_sk2(sk14,X1,X1),sk15) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
sum(sk15,sk14) = sk14,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
sk14 != sk15,
part_of_antisymmetry_69 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ incident_c(ax0_sk2(sk14,sk15,sk15),sk15),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : GEO082-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:23:04 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FrgXQ6urpb/E---3.1_19236.p
% 1.05/0.62 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1.05/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.05/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # sh5l with pid 19342 completed with status 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Result found by sh5l
% 1.05/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.05/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.05/0.62 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 1.05/0.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 19349 completed with status 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.05/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.05/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.05/0.62 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 1.05/0.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.05/0.62 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 1.05/0.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 1.05/0.62 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.05/0.62
% 1.05/0.62 # Proof found!
% 1.05/0.62 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.05/0.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.05/0.62 # Parsed axioms : 51
% 1.05/0.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10
% 1.05/0.62 # Initial clauses : 41
% 1.05/0.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 1.05/0.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 1.05/0.62 # Processed clauses : 899
% 1.05/0.62 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 1.05/0.62 # ...subsumed : 358
% 1.05/0.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 536
% 1.05/0.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 1.05/0.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 1.05/0.62 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 1.05/0.62 # Generated clauses : 4885
% 1.05/0.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4715
% 1.05/0.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 22
% 1.05/0.62 # Paramodulations : 4849
% 1.05/0.62 # Factorizations : 32
% 1.05/0.62 # NegExts : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 1.05/0.62 # Total rewrite steps : 548
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.05/0.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.05/0.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.05/0.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.05/0.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.05/0.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 481
% 1.05/0.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 1.05/0.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 1.05/0.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 460
% 1.05/0.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3846
% 1.05/0.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 15841
% 1.05/0.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 51
% 1.05/0.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22771
% 1.05/0.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12565
% 1.05/0.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 384
% 1.05/0.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 114
% 1.05/0.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 1.05/0.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 1.05/0.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.05/0.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 99717
% 1.05/0.62
% 1.05/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/0.62 # User time : 0.105 s
% 1.05/0.62 # System time : 0.009 s
% 1.05/0.62 # Total time : 0.114 s
% 1.05/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
% 1.05/0.62
% 1.05/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/0.62 # User time : 0.107 s
% 1.05/0.62 # System time : 0.010 s
% 1.05/0.62 # Total time : 0.118 s
% 1.05/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 1.05/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------