TSTP Solution File: GEO082+1 by lazyCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : GEO082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:58:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.85s 1.12s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:27:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.85/1.12  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.85/1.12  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 5.85/1.12  	part_of(sK17,sK18)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c1, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	part_of(sK17,sK18),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 5.85/1.12  	incident_c(X0,X1) | ~incident_c(X0,X2) | ~part_of(X2,X1)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK17 = X2).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK18 = X1).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c3, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c4, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	incident_c(X0,X1) | ~incident_c(X0,X2),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c5, axiom,
% 5.85/1.12  	incident_c(X3,X4) | ~incident_c(X3,X5) | ~part_of(X5,X4)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X0 = X3).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X1 = X5).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c6, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	~incident_c(X0,X2),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c7, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	incident_c(X3,X4) | ~part_of(X5,X4),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c8, axiom,
% 5.85/1.12  	X6 = X7 | ~incident_c(sK16(X6,X7),X7) | ~incident_c(sK16(X6,X7),X6)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X3 = sK16(X6,X7)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X4 = X7).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c9, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	~part_of(X5,X4),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c7, c8])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c10, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	X6 = X7 | ~incident_c(sK16(X6,X7),X6),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c7, c8])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c11, axiom,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK17 != sK18).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK18 = X6).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c12, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	~incident_c(sK16(X6,X7),X6),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c11])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c13, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c11])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c14, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK17 != X7,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c11])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK17 = X7).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c15, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a7])], [c14])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c16, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	incident_c(X0,X1)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK16(X6,X7) = X0).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X6 = X1).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c17, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c12, c16])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c18, axiom,
% 5.85/1.12  	part_of(sK18,sK17)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X5 = sK18).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a11, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X4 = sK17).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c19, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a10, a11])], [c9, c18])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c20, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a10, a11])], [c9, c18])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c21, axiom,
% 5.85/1.12  	X8 = X9 | incident_c(sK16(X8,X9),X9) | incident_c(sK16(X8,X9),X8)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a12, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X0 = sK16(X8,X9)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a13, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X2 = X9).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c22, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a12, a13])], [c6, c21])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c23, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	X8 = X9 | incident_c(sK16(X8,X9),X8),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a12, a13])], [c6, c21])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c24, axiom,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK17 != sK18).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a14, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK18 = X8).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c25, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	incident_c(sK16(X8,X9),X8),
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a14])], [c23, c24])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c26, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a14])], [c23, c24])).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c27, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK17 != X9,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a14])], [c23, c24])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a15, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK17 = X9).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c28, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a15])], [c27])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c29, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	~incident_c(X0,X1)).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a16, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	sK16(X8,X9) = X0).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(a17, assumption,
% 5.85/1.12  	X8 = X1).
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c30, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a16, a17])], [c25, c29])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  cnf(c31, plain,
% 5.85/1.12  	$false,
% 5.85/1.12  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X0, sK16(X6,X7)),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X1, sK18),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X2, sK17),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X3, sK16(X6,X7)),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X4, sK17),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X5, sK18),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X6, sK18),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X7, sK17),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X8, sK18),
% 5.85/1.12  		bind(X9, sK17)
% 5.85/1.12  	],
% 5.85/1.12  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15, a16, a17])).
% 5.85/1.12  
% 5.85/1.12  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------