TSTP Solution File: GEO082+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : GEO082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:29:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 3.22s 3.42s
% Output : Proof 3.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.06 % Problem : GEO082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.07 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.06/0.25 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.06/0.25 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:27:27 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 3.22/3.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.22/3.42 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 3.22/3.42 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 3.22/3.42 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.22/3.42 1. (incident_c T_0 T_1) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 3.22/3.42 2. (-. (incident_c T_0 T_2)) (incident_c T_0 T_2) ### Axiom
% 3.22/3.42 3. ((incident_c T_0 T_1) => (incident_c T_0 T_2)) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_2)) (incident_c T_0 T_1) ### Imply 1 2
% 3.22/3.42 4. (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) (incident_c T_0 T_1) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_2)) ### All 3
% 3.22/3.42 5. (incident_c T_0 T_2) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_2)) ### Axiom
% 3.22/3.42 6. (-. (incident_c T_0 T_1)) (incident_c T_0 T_1) ### Axiom
% 3.22/3.42 7. ((incident_c T_0 T_2) => (incident_c T_0 T_1)) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_1)) (incident_c T_0 T_2) ### Imply 5 6
% 3.22/3.42 8. (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_1))) (incident_c T_0 T_2) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_1)) ### All 7
% 3.22/3.42 9. (-. ((incident_c T_0 T_2) <=> (incident_c T_0 T_1))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_1))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) ### NotEquiv 4 8
% 3.22/3.42 10. (-. (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) <=> (incident_c P T_1)))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_1))) ### NotAllEx 9
% 3.22/3.42 11. (T_2 != T_1) (T_2 = T_1) ### Axiom
% 3.22/3.42 12. ((All P, ((incident_c P T_2) <=> (incident_c P T_1))) => (T_2 = T_1)) (T_2 != T_1) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_1))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) ### Imply 10 11
% 3.22/3.42 13. (All C1, ((All P, ((incident_c P T_2) <=> (incident_c P C1))) => (T_2 = C1))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_1))) (T_2 != T_1) ### All 12
% 3.22/3.42 14. (All C, (All C1, ((All P, ((incident_c P C) <=> (incident_c P C1))) => (C = C1)))) (T_2 != T_1) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_1))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) ### All 13
% 3.22/3.42 15. (part_of T_1 T_2) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_1))) (T_2 != T_1) (All C, (All C1, ((All P, ((incident_c P C) <=> (incident_c P C1))) => (C = C1)))) ### Definition-Pseudo(part_of) 14
% 3.22/3.42 16. (part_of T_2 T_1) (All C, (All C1, ((All P, ((incident_c P C) <=> (incident_c P C1))) => (C = C1)))) (T_2 != T_1) (part_of T_1 T_2) ### Definition-Pseudo(part_of) 15
% 3.22/3.42 17. (-. (((part_of T_2 T_1) /\ (part_of T_1 T_2)) => (T_2 = T_1))) (All C, (All C1, ((All P, ((incident_c P C) <=> (incident_c P C1))) => (C = C1)))) ### ConjTree 16
% 3.22/3.42 18. (-. (All C2, (((part_of T_2 C2) /\ (part_of C2 T_2)) => (T_2 = C2)))) (All C, (All C1, ((All P, ((incident_c P C) <=> (incident_c P C1))) => (C = C1)))) ### NotAllEx 17
% 3.22/3.42 19. (-. (All C1, (All C2, (((part_of C1 C2) /\ (part_of C2 C1)) => (C1 = C2))))) (All C, (All C1, ((All P, ((incident_c P C) <=> (incident_c P C1))) => (C = C1)))) ### NotAllEx 18
% 3.22/3.42 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.22/3.42 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------