TSTP Solution File: GEO082+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GEO082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:03:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  16   ~;  20   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   2 sgn  17   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(part_of_antisymmetry,conjecture,
    ! [X2,X4] :
      ( ( part_of(X2,X4)
        & part_of(X4,X2) )
     => X2 = X4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',part_of_antisymmetry) ).

fof(part_of_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( part_of(X2,X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( incident_c(X3,X2)
         => incident_c(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',part_of_defn) ).

fof(c9,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( incident_c(X3,X1)
        <=> incident_c(X3,X2) )
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',c9) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2,X4] :
        ( ( part_of(X2,X4)
          & part_of(X4,X2) )
       => X2 = X4 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[part_of_antisymmetry]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ part_of(X5,X4)
        | ~ incident_c(X6,X5)
        | incident_c(X6,X4) )
      & ( incident_c(esk3_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | part_of(X5,X4) )
      & ( ~ incident_c(esk3_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | part_of(X5,X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[part_of_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( part_of(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & part_of(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & esk1_0 != esk2_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( incident_c(X1,X2)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,X3)
    | ~ part_of(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ incident_c(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | ~ incident_c(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | X4 = X5 )
      & ( incident_c(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | incident_c(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | X4 = X5 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c9])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | incident_c(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | incident_c(esk6_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ incident_c(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ incident_c(esk6_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | incident_c(esk6_2(X1,esk1_0),esk2_0)
    | incident_c(esk6_2(X1,esk1_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | ~ incident_c(esk6_2(X1,esk1_0),esk2_0)
    | ~ incident_c(esk6_2(X1,esk1_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    incident_c(esk6_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk2_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17])]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : GEO082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:27:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 19
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 12
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 12
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 0.24/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 31
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 31
% 0.24/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 33
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 22
% 0.24/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 29
% 0.24/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 31
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.24/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 26
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.24/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 56
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 152
% 0.24/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.24/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 17
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2061
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 2828 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------