TSTP Solution File: GEO081-1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : GEO081-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:45:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   30
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (   7 unt;  24 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  11   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   40 (  21   >;  19   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    part_of: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    incident_c: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    ax0_sk1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    sum: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    ax0_sk2: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    end_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    ax0_sk3: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    ax0_sk4: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    inner_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    meet: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    ax0_sk5: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    closed: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    ax0_sk6: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    open: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    ax0_sk7: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    ax0_sk8: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    ax0_sk9: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    ax0_sk10: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    ax0_sk11: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    ax0_sk12: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    ax0_sk13: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    sk14: $i ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    sk15: $i ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    sk16: $i ).

cnf(part_of_defn_1,axiom,
    ( incident_c(X3,X2)
    | ~ part_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ incident_c(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_1) ).

cnf(part_of_transitivity_68,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk15,sk16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',part_of_transitivity_68) ).

cnf(part_of_transitivity_67,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk14,sk15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',part_of_transitivity_67) ).

cnf(part_of_defn_3,axiom,
    ( part_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_3) ).

cnf(part_of_defn_2,axiom,
    ( incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X1)
    | part_of(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_2) ).

cnf(part_of_transitivity_69,negated_conjecture,
    ~ part_of(sk14,sk16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',part_of_transitivity_69) ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    ( incident_c(X3,X2)
    | ~ part_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ incident_c(X3,X1) ),
    part_of_defn_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk15,sk16),
    part_of_transitivity_68 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk14,sk15),
    part_of_transitivity_67 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( part_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X2) ),
    part_of_defn_3 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(X1,sk16)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,sk15) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(X1,sk15)
    | ~ incident_c(X1,sk14) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X1)
    | part_of(X1,X2) ),
    part_of_defn_2 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( part_of(X1,sk16)
    | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,sk16),sk15) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( incident_c(ax0_sk1(sk14,X1),sk15)
    | part_of(sk14,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ part_of(sk14,sk16),
    part_of_transitivity_69 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem    : GEO081-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.23/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.23/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.23/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 20:42:38 EDT 2023
% 0.23/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.60  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.23/0.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.62  % Proof found
% 0.23/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.62  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.62  % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.23/0.62  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.23/0.62  % Total time : 0.012000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------