TSTP Solution File: GEO081+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : GEO081+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:13:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  30   ~;  16   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (  35   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f188,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f184,f106]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ~ part_of(sK3,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( ~ part_of(sK3,sK5)
    & part_of(sK4,sK5)
    & part_of(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4,sK5])],[f36,f62]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ~ part_of(X0,X2)
        & part_of(X1,X2)
        & part_of(X0,X1) )
   => ( ~ part_of(sK3,sK5)
      & part_of(sK4,sK5)
      & part_of(sK3,sK4) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ part_of(X0,X2)
      & part_of(X1,X2)
      & part_of(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ part_of(X0,X2)
      & part_of(X1,X2)
      & part_of(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( part_of(X1,X2)
          & part_of(X0,X1) )
       => part_of(X0,X2) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X3,X5] :
        ( ( part_of(X3,X5)
          & part_of(X1,X3) )
       => part_of(X1,X5) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X3,X5] :
      ( ( part_of(X3,X5)
        & part_of(X1,X3) )
     => part_of(X1,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',part_of_transitivity) ).

fof(f184,plain,
    part_of(sK3,sK5),
    inference(resolution,[],[f181,f132]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(sK16(X0,X1),X1)
      | part_of(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( part_of(X1,X0)
        | ( ~ incident_c(sK16(X0,X1),X0)
          & incident_c(sK16(X0,X1),X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( incident_c(X3,X0)
            | ~ incident_c(X3,X1) )
        | ~ part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK16])],[f89,f90]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ~ incident_c(X2,X0)
          & incident_c(X2,X1) )
     => ( ~ incident_c(sK16(X0,X1),X0)
        & incident_c(sK16(X0,X1),X1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( part_of(X1,X0)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ incident_c(X2,X0)
            & incident_c(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( incident_c(X3,X0)
            | ~ incident_c(X3,X1) )
        | ~ part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( part_of(X1,X0)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ incident_c(X2,X0)
            & incident_c(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( incident_c(X2,X0)
            | ~ incident_c(X2,X1) )
        | ~ part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( incident_c(X2,X0)
          | ~ incident_c(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( incident_c(X2,X1)
         => incident_c(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',part_of_defn) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ~ incident_c(sK16(sK5,sK3),sK3),
    inference(resolution,[],[f174,f104]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    part_of(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f174,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ part_of(X0,sK4)
      | ~ incident_c(sK16(sK5,sK3),X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f171,f131]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
      | ~ part_of(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f171,plain,
    ~ incident_c(sK16(sK5,sK3),sK4),
    inference(resolution,[],[f169,f105]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    part_of(sK4,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ part_of(X0,sK5)
      | ~ incident_c(sK16(sK5,sK3),X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f131,f157]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ~ incident_c(sK16(sK5,sK3),sK5),
    inference(resolution,[],[f133,f106]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(sK16(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO081+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 06:19:26 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  % (3219)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37  % (3221)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (3222)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.37  % (3220)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (3223)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (3222)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (3224)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (3225)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (3226)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)Memory used [KB]: 924
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (3225)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (3219)Success in time 0.022 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------