TSTP Solution File: GEO081+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : GEO081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:29:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 3.41s 3.58s
% Output : Proof 3.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:22:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 3.41/3.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.41/3.58 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 3.41/3.58 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 3.41/3.58 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.41/3.58 1. (incident_c T_0 T_1) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 3.41/3.58 2. (-. (incident_c T_0 T_2)) (incident_c T_0 T_2) ### Axiom
% 3.41/3.58 3. ((incident_c T_0 T_1) => (incident_c T_0 T_2)) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_2)) (incident_c T_0 T_1) ### Imply 1 2
% 3.41/3.58 4. (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) (incident_c T_0 T_1) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_2)) ### All 3
% 3.41/3.58 5. (-. (incident_c T_0 T_3)) (incident_c T_0 T_3) ### Axiom
% 3.41/3.58 6. ((incident_c T_0 T_2) => (incident_c T_0 T_3)) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_3)) (incident_c T_0 T_1) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) ### Imply 4 5
% 3.41/3.58 7. (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_3))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) (incident_c T_0 T_1) (-. (incident_c T_0 T_3)) ### All 6
% 3.41/3.58 8. (-. ((incident_c T_0 T_1) => (incident_c T_0 T_3))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_3))) ### NotImply 7
% 3.41/3.58 9. (-. (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_3)))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_3))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) ### NotAllEx 8
% 3.41/3.58 10. (-. (part_of T_1 T_3)) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) (All P, ((incident_c P T_2) => (incident_c P T_3))) ### Definition-Pseudo(part_of) 9
% 3.41/3.58 11. (part_of T_2 T_3) (All P, ((incident_c P T_1) => (incident_c P T_2))) (-. (part_of T_1 T_3)) ### Definition-Pseudo(part_of) 10
% 3.41/3.58 12. (part_of T_1 T_2) (-. (part_of T_1 T_3)) (part_of T_2 T_3) ### Definition-Pseudo(part_of) 11
% 3.41/3.58 13. (-. (((part_of T_1 T_2) /\ (part_of T_2 T_3)) => (part_of T_1 T_3))) ### ConjTree 12
% 3.41/3.58 14. (-. (All C3, (((part_of T_1 T_2) /\ (part_of T_2 C3)) => (part_of T_1 C3)))) ### NotAllEx 13
% 3.41/3.58 15. (-. (All C2, (All C3, (((part_of T_1 C2) /\ (part_of C2 C3)) => (part_of T_1 C3))))) ### NotAllEx 14
% 3.41/3.58 16. (-. (All C1, (All C2, (All C3, (((part_of C1 C2) /\ (part_of C2 C3)) => (part_of C1 C3)))))) ### NotAllEx 15
% 3.41/3.58 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.41/3.58 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------