TSTP Solution File: GEO081+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.42s 2.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
( incident_c(X1,X2)
| ~ part_of(X3,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ogy9zs9e/input.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_39,negated_conjecture,
part_of(esk14_0,esk15_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ogy9zs9e/input.p',i_0_39) ).
cnf(i_0_40,negated_conjecture,
part_of(esk13_0,esk14_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ogy9zs9e/input.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_35,plain,
( part_of(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_c(esk12_2(X2,X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ogy9zs9e/input.p',i_0_35) ).
cnf(i_0_36,plain,
( part_of(X1,X2)
| incident_c(esk12_2(X2,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ogy9zs9e/input.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ part_of(esk13_0,esk15_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ogy9zs9e/input.p',i_0_38) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( incident_c(X1,X2)
| ~ part_of(X3,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X1,X3) ),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
part_of(esk14_0,esk15_0),
i_0_39 ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
part_of(esk13_0,esk14_0),
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( part_of(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_c(esk12_2(X2,X1),X2) ),
i_0_35 ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
( incident_c(X1,esk15_0)
| ~ incident_c(X1,esk14_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
( incident_c(X1,esk14_0)
| ~ incident_c(X1,esk13_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( part_of(X1,X2)
| incident_c(esk12_2(X2,X1),X1) ),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( part_of(X1,esk15_0)
| ~ incident_c(esk12_2(esk15_0,X1),esk14_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( incident_c(esk12_2(X1,esk13_0),esk14_0)
| part_of(esk13_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
~ part_of(esk13_0,esk15_0),
i_0_38 ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_56]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:09:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.42/2.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.42/2.39 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.42/2.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 7.42/2.39
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof found!
% 7.42/2.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.42/2.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 7.42/2.39 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.42/2.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.42/2.39 # Parsed axioms : 46
% 7.42/2.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Initial clauses : 46
% 7.42/2.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 46
% 7.42/2.39 # Processed clauses : 67
% 7.42/2.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # ...subsumed : 2
% 7.42/2.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 65
% 7.42/2.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 7.42/2.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Generated clauses : 94
% 7.42/2.39 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 77
% 7.42/2.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Paramodulations : 80
% 7.42/2.39 # Factorizations : 8
% 7.42/2.39 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 7.42/2.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 65
% 7.42/2.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 7.42/2.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 7.42/2.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 57
% 7.42/2.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 55
% 7.42/2.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 289
% 7.42/2.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 368
% 7.42/2.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 186
% 7.42/2.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 7.42/2.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 7.42/2.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 18
% 7.42/2.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.42/2.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2311
% 7.42/2.39
% 7.42/2.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.42/2.39 # User time : 0.009 s
% 7.42/2.39 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.42/2.39 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 7.42/2.39 # ...preprocessing : 0.014 s
% 7.42/2.39 # ...main loop : 0.003 s
% 7.42/2.39 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.42/2.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------