TSTP Solution File: GEO077-4 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GEO077-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:13:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.71s 1.94s
% Output   : Refutation 1.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  17 unt;   5 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   59 (  18 equ;  28 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_G1D,axiom,
    ( ~ on(X,Y)
    | X = Z
    | ~ on(Z,Y)
    | Y = U
    | ~ on(X,U)
    | ~ on(Z,U)
    | ~ point(X)
    | ~ point(Z)
    | ~ line(Y)
    | ~ line(U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO003-0.ax',axiom_G1D) ).

cnf(axiom_G10A,axiom,
    ( ~ point(X)
    | ~ point(Y)
    | ~ point(Z)
    | X = Y
    | X = Z
    | Y = Z
    | on(X,line_through_3_points(X,Y,Z))
    | ~ collinear(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO003-0.ax',axiom_G10A) ).

cnf(axiom_G10B,axiom,
    ( ~ point(X)
    | ~ point(Y)
    | ~ point(Z)
    | X = Y
    | X = Z
    | Y = Z
    | on(Y,line_through_3_points(X,Y,Z))
    | ~ collinear(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO003-0.ax',axiom_G10B) ).

cnf(axiom_G10C,axiom,
    ( ~ point(X)
    | ~ point(Y)
    | ~ point(Z)
    | X = Y
    | X = Z
    | Y = Z
    | on(Z,line_through_3_points(X,Y,Z))
    | ~ collinear(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO003-0.ax',axiom_G10C) ).

cnf(axiom_G10D,axiom,
    ( ~ point(X)
    | ~ point(Y)
    | ~ point(Z)
    | X = Y
    | X = Z
    | Y = Z
    | line(line_through_3_points(X,Y,Z))
    | ~ collinear(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO003-0.ax',axiom_G10D) ).

cnf(point1,hypothesis,
    point(point1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point1) ).

cnf(point2,hypothesis,
    point(point2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point2) ).

cnf(point3,hypothesis,
    point(point3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point3) ).

cnf(line,hypothesis,
    line(a_line),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',line) ).

cnf(point1_on_line,hypothesis,
    on(point1,a_line),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point1_on_line) ).

cnf(point2_on_line,hypothesis,
    on(point2,a_line),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point2_on_line) ).

cnf(point3_not_on_line,hypothesis,
    ~ on(point3,a_line),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point3_not_on_line) ).

cnf(point1_not_point2,hypothesis,
    point1 != point2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point1_not_point2) ).

cnf(point1_not_point3,hypothesis,
    point1 != point3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point1_not_point3) ).

cnf(point2_not_point3,hypothesis,
    point2 != point3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',point2_not_point3) ).

cnf(prove_points_noncollinear,negated_conjecture,
    collinear(point1,point2,point3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_points_noncollinear) ).

cnf(80,plain,
    line(line_through_3_points(point1,point2,point3)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[axiom_G10D,point1,point2,point3,point1_not_point2,point1_not_point3,point2_not_point3,prove_points_noncollinear]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    on(point1,line_through_3_points(point1,point2,point3)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[axiom_G10A,point1,point2,point3,point1_not_point2,point1_not_point3,point2_not_point3,prove_points_noncollinear]) ).

cnf(97,plain,
    on(point2,line_through_3_points(point1,point2,point3)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[axiom_G10B,point1,point2,point3,point1_not_point2,point1_not_point3,point2_not_point3,prove_points_noncollinear]) ).

cnf(98,plain,
    on(point3,line_through_3_points(point1,point2,point3)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[axiom_G10C,point1,point2,point3,point1_not_point2,point1_not_point3,point2_not_point3,prove_points_noncollinear]) ).

cnf(2366,plain,
    line_through_3_points(point1,point2,point3) = a_line,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[axiom_G1D,97,point1_not_point2,96,point2_on_line,point1_on_line,point2,point1,80,line]) ).

cnf(2367,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[98,point3_not_on_line,2366,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO077-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:54:13 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  "."
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T12:54:13
% 0.21/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-06-18T12:54:13
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  #||
% 1.71/1.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.71/1.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.71/1.94  ||#
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.71/1.94  ;      4369 formulas have been input or derived (from 78 formulas).
% 1.71/1.94  ;      2367 (54%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.71/1.94  ;          127 ( 5%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.71/1.94  ;         2240 (95%) are still being kept.
% 1.71/1.94  ; 
% 1.71/1.94  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.011   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.003   0%   Assert                       (42 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.256  18%   Process new row              (4,159 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.695  48%   Resolution                   (154 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (77 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.006   0%   Condensing                   (2,252 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.219  15%   Forward subsumption          (2,252 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.082   6%   Backward subsumption         (2,252 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.030   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (13,890 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.099   7%   Forward simplification       (4,086 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.005   0%   Backward simplification      (2,367 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.010   1%   Ordering                     (9,405 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     0.036   2%   Other
% 1.71/1.94  ;     1.452        Total
% 1.71/1.94  ;     1.454        Real time
% 1.71/1.94  ; 
% 1.71/1.94  ; Term-hash-array has 3,514 terms in all.
% 1.71/1.94  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,156 entries (2,228 at peak, 2,252 added, 96 deleted).
% 1.71/1.94  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,790 nodes (2,876 at peak, 2,896 added, 106 deleted).
% 1.71/1.94  ;  Retrieved 7,365 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,252 calls.
% 1.71/1.94  ;  Retrieved 7,509 possibly backward subsumed rows in 2,252 calls.
% 1.71/1.94  ; Path-index has 3,359 entries (3,444 at peak, 3,543 added, 184 deleted).
% 1.71/1.94  ; Path-index has 562 nodes (601 at peak, 601 added, 39 deleted).
% 1.71/1.94  ; Trie-index has 3,359 entries (3,444 at peak, 3,543 added, 184 deleted).
% 1.71/1.94  ; Trie-index has 6,497 nodes (6,569 at peak, 6,803 added, 306 deleted).
% 1.71/1.94  ; Retrieved 1,270 generalization terms in 14,195 calls.
% 1.71/1.94  ; Retrieved 114 instance terms in 114 calls.
% 1.71/1.94  ; Retrieved 1,679,692 unifiable terms in 113,341 calls.
% 1.71/1.94  ; 
% 1.71/1.94  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 7 entries:
% 1.71/1.94  ;     7 with value 0
% 1.71/1.94  ; The agenda of rows to process has 35 entries:
% 1.71/1.94  ;     1 with value 11              8 with value 14               8 with value 16
% 1.71/1.94  ;     1 with value 13              9 with value 15               8 with value 17
% 1.71/1.94  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2171 entries:
% 1.71/1.94  ;     2 with value (4 9)          52 with value (4 20)          48 with value (4 36)
% 1.71/1.94  ;    13 with value (4 10)         12 with value (4 21)         144 with value (4 38)
% 1.71/1.94  ;     6 with value (4 11)         12 with value (4 22)         234 with value (4 39)
% 1.71/1.94  ;    25 with value (4 13)         96 with value (4 30)         234 with value (4 40)
% 1.71/1.94  ;    19 with value (4 14)        192 with value (4 31)         468 with value (4 41)
% 1.71/1.94  ;    36 with value (4 16)        120 with value (4 32)          72 with value (4 43)
% 1.71/1.94  ;    36 with value (4 17)         24 with value (4 33)         216 with value (4 45)
% 1.71/1.94  ;    62 with value (4 18)         48 with value (4 34)
% 1.71/1.94  Evaluation took:
% 1.71/1.94    1.454 seconds of real time
% 1.71/1.94    1.371174 seconds of user run time
% 1.71/1.94    0.08294 seconds of system run time
% 1.71/1.94    [Run times include 0.078 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.71/1.94    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.71/1.94    0 page faults and
% 1.71/1.94    129,195,336 bytes consed.
% 1.71/1.94  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.71/1.94  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T12:54:14
% 1.71/1.94  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.71/1.94  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------