TSTP Solution File: GEO069-3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO069-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 17 unt; 2 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 41 ( 4 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(t10_4,axiom,
( colinear(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eTZoeQBLWT/E---3.1_32359.p',t10_4) ).
cnf(xvu_colinear,hypothesis,
colinear(x,v,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eTZoeQBLWT/E---3.1_32359.p',xvu_colinear) ).
cnf(wvu_colinear,hypothesis,
colinear(w,v,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eTZoeQBLWT/E---3.1_32359.p',wvu_colinear) ).
cnf(t12_2,axiom,
( colinear(X2,X3,X4)
| X1 = X2
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eTZoeQBLWT/E---3.1_32359.p',t12_2) ).
cnf(u_not_v,hypothesis,
u != v,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eTZoeQBLWT/E---3.1_32359.p',u_not_v) ).
cnf(t10_1,axiom,
( colinear(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eTZoeQBLWT/E---3.1_32359.p',t10_1) ).
cnf(prove_xwu_and_xwv_colinear,negated_conjecture,
( ~ colinear(x,w,u)
| ~ colinear(x,w,v) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eTZoeQBLWT/E---3.1_32359.p',prove_xwu_and_xwv_colinear) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( colinear(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
t10_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
colinear(x,v,u),
xvu_colinear ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
colinear(u,x,v),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
colinear(w,v,u),
wvu_colinear ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( colinear(X2,X3,X4)
| X1 = X2
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X4) ),
t12_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
colinear(v,u,x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
u != v,
u_not_v ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
colinear(u,w,v),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( colinear(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
t10_1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( colinear(u,X1,x)
| ~ colinear(v,u,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
colinear(v,u,w),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
colinear(u,v,x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
colinear(u,w,x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
( colinear(v,X1,x)
| ~ colinear(u,v,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
colinear(u,v,w),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ colinear(x,w,u)
| ~ colinear(x,w,v) ),
prove_xwu_and_xwv_colinear ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
colinear(x,w,u),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
colinear(v,w,x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ colinear(x,w,v),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : GEO069-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 07:02:18 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eTZoeQBLWT/E---3.1_32359.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # new_bool_3 with pid 32437 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with pid 32440 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 107
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 39
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 68
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 67
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 159
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 25
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 132
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 234
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 107
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 232
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 150
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 65
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 36
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 258
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 65
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1687
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1301
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 50
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3960
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------