TSTP Solution File: GEO064-3 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : GEO064-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:27:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.79s 0.58s
% Output : Proof 1.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : GEO064-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 21:40:31 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.79/0.58 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 1.79/0.58
% 1.79/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.79/0.58
% 1.79/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% 1.79/0.59 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 1.79/0.59 fof(colinearity1, axiom, ![X, Y, Z]: (~between(X, Y, Z) | colinear(X, Y, Z))).
% 1.79/0.59 fof(prove_uvw_colinear, negated_conjecture, ~colinear(u, v, w)).
% 1.79/0.59 fof(t1, axiom, ![V, W, U]: (~between(U, V, W) | between(W, V, U))).
% 1.79/0.59 fof(v_between_w_and_u, hypothesis, between(w, v, u)).
% 1.79/0.59
% 1.79/0.59 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 1.79/0.59 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 1.79/0.59 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 1.79/0.59 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 1.79/0.59 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 1.79/0.59 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 1.79/0.59 variables of u and v.
% 1.79/0.59 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 1.79/0.59 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 1.79/0.59
% 1.79/0.59 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 1.79/0.59
% 1.79/0.59 Axiom 1 (v_between_w_and_u): between(w, v, u) = true2.
% 1.79/0.59 Axiom 2 (colinearity1): fresh40(X, X, Y, Z, W) = true2.
% 1.79/0.59 Axiom 3 (t1): fresh15(X, X, Y, Z, W) = true2.
% 1.79/0.59 Axiom 4 (colinearity1): fresh40(between(X, Y, Z), true2, X, Y, Z) = colinear(X, Y, Z).
% 1.79/0.59 Axiom 5 (t1): fresh15(between(X, Y, Z), true2, X, Y, Z) = between(Z, Y, X).
% 1.79/0.59
% 1.79/0.59 Goal 1 (prove_uvw_colinear): colinear(u, v, w) = true2.
% 1.79/0.59 Proof:
% 1.79/0.59 colinear(u, v, w)
% 1.79/0.59 = { by axiom 4 (colinearity1) R->L }
% 1.79/0.59 fresh40(between(u, v, w), true2, u, v, w)
% 1.79/0.59 = { by axiom 5 (t1) R->L }
% 1.79/0.59 fresh40(fresh15(between(w, v, u), true2, w, v, u), true2, u, v, w)
% 1.79/0.59 = { by axiom 1 (v_between_w_and_u) }
% 1.79/0.59 fresh40(fresh15(true2, true2, w, v, u), true2, u, v, w)
% 1.79/0.59 = { by axiom 3 (t1) }
% 1.79/0.59 fresh40(true2, true2, u, v, w)
% 1.79/0.59 = { by axiom 2 (colinearity1) }
% 1.79/0.59 true2
% 1.79/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 1.79/0.59
% 1.79/0.59 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------