TSTP Solution File: GEO064-2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : GEO064-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:07:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 14 ~; 13 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 36 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f197,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f196,f24]) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
~ colinear(u,v,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_uvw_colinear) ).
fof(f196,plain,
colinear(u,v,w),
inference(resolution,[],[f189,f19]) ).
fof(f19,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ between(X0,X1,X2)
| colinear(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',colinearity1) ).
fof(f189,plain,
between(u,v,w),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f188,f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
! [X3,X4] : between(X3,X4,X4),
inference(superposition,[],[f4,f32]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : extension(X1,X0,X2,X2) = X0,
inference(resolution,[],[f5,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X2)
| X0 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity_for_equidistance) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1,X5] : equidistant(X1,extension(X0,X1,X5,X3),X5,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',segment_construction2) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1,X5] : between(X0,X1,extension(X0,X1,X5,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',segment_construction1) ).
fof(f188,plain,
( ~ between(v,u,u)
| between(u,v,w) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f186,f23]) ).
fof(f23,axiom,
between(w,v,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',v_between_w_and_u) ).
fof(f186,plain,
( between(u,v,w)
| ~ between(w,v,u)
| ~ between(v,u,u) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f9,f183]) ).
fof(f183,plain,
v = inner_pasch(w,v,u,u,v),
inference(resolution,[],[f116,f34]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ between(v,X0,u)
| v = inner_pasch(w,v,u,X0,v) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f40,f23]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ between(X3,X0,X2)
| ~ between(X0,X1,X2)
| inner_pasch(X3,X0,X2,X1,X0) = X0 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ between(X0,X1,X0)
| X0 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity_for_betweeness) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X3,X10,X0,X1,X5] :
( between(X3,inner_pasch(X10,X3,X5,X0,X1),X1)
| ~ between(X1,X0,X5)
| ~ between(X10,X3,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inner_pasch1) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X3,X10,X0,X1,X5] :
( between(X0,inner_pasch(X10,X3,X5,X0,X1),X10)
| ~ between(X10,X3,X5)
| ~ between(X1,X0,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inner_pasch2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO064-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 21:15:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 % (18380)lrs+10_1:1_kws=precedence:lwlo=on:tgt=ground:i=99966:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99966Mi)
% 0.19/0.47 % (18406)dis+10_1:1_add=large:alpa=false:anc=none:fd=off:lcm=reverse:nwc=5.0:sd=2:sgt=20:ss=included:i=46:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 0.19/0.47 % (18380)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.47 % (18389)lrs+1011_1:1_atotf=0.0306256:ep=RST:mep=off:nm=0:sos=all:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)Time elapsed: 0.115 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (18389)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)Time elapsed: 0.095 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (18380)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (18376)Success in time 0.148 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------