TSTP Solution File: GEO064-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO064-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.81s 2.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  14 unt;  14 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  22   ~;  19   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   35 (   8   >;  27   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (;  64   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ equidistant > colinear > between > continuous > inner_pasch > euclid2 > euclid1 > extension > #nlpp > w > v > u > lower_dimension_point_3 > lower_dimension_point_2 > lower_dimension_point_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(lower_dimension_point_1,type,
    lower_dimension_point_1: $i ).

tff(euclid2,type,
    euclid2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(lower_dimension_point_2,type,
    lower_dimension_point_2: $i ).

tff(w,type,
    w: $i ).

tff(colinear,type,
    colinear: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(equidistant,type,
    equidistant: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(u,type,
    u: $i ).

tff(lower_dimension_point_3,type,
    lower_dimension_point_3: $i ).

tff(v,type,
    v: $i ).

tff(extension,type,
    extension: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(euclid1,type,
    euclid1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(between,type,
    between: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(inner_pasch,type,
    inner_pasch: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(continuous,type,
    continuous: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_251,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ~ between(X,Y,Z)
      | colinear(X,Y,Z) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_275,axiom,
    ~ colinear(u,v,w),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_273,axiom,
    between(w,v,u),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_78,axiom,
    ! [Y,X,W,V] : equidistant(Y,extension(X,Y,W,V),W,V),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_71,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ~ equidistant(X,Y,Z,Z)
      | ( X = Y ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_75,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,W,V] : between(X,Y,extension(X,Y,W,V)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_117,axiom,
    ! [W,U,X,Y,V] :
      ( ~ between(U,V,W)
      | ~ between(Y,X,W)
      | between(V,inner_pasch(U,V,W,X,Y),Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_107,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ between(X,Y,X)
      | ( X = Y ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_126,axiom,
    ! [W,U,X,Y,V] :
      ( ~ between(U,V,W)
      | ~ between(Y,X,W)
      | between(X,inner_pasch(U,V,W,X,Y),U) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_63,plain,
    ! [X_94,Y_95,Z_96] :
      ( colinear(X_94,Y_95,Z_96)
      | ~ between(X_94,Y_95,Z_96) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_251]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    ~ colinear(u,v,w),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_275]) ).

tff(c_67,plain,
    ~ between(u,v,w),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_48]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    between(w,v,u),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_273]) ).

tff(c_74,plain,
    ! [Y_104,X_105,W_106,V_107] : equidistant(Y_104,extension(X_105,Y_104,W_106,V_107),W_106,V_107),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_78]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [Y_10,X_9,Z_11] :
      ( ( Y_10 = X_9 )
      | ~ equidistant(X_9,Y_10,Z_11,Z_11) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_80,plain,
    ! [X_108,Y_109,V_110] : ( extension(X_108,Y_109,V_110,V_110) = Y_109 ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_74,c_6]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [X_12,Y_13,W_14,V_15] : between(X_12,Y_13,extension(X_12,Y_13,W_14,V_15)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_75]) ).

tff(c_89,plain,
    ! [X_108,Y_109] : between(X_108,Y_109,Y_109),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_80,c_8]) ).

tff(c_337,plain,
    ! [Y_171,X_173,V_175,U_172,W_174] :
      ( between(V_175,inner_pasch(U_172,V_175,W_174,X_173,Y_171),Y_171)
      | ~ between(Y_171,X_173,W_174)
      | ~ between(U_172,V_175,W_174) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_117]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [Y_29,X_28] :
      ( ( Y_29 = X_28 )
      | ~ between(X_28,Y_29,X_28) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_107]) ).

tff(c_1461,plain,
    ! [U_355,Y_356,W_357,X_358] :
      ( ( inner_pasch(U_355,Y_356,W_357,X_358,Y_356) = Y_356 )
      | ~ between(Y_356,X_358,W_357)
      | ~ between(U_355,Y_356,W_357) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_337,c_14]) ).

tff(c_1570,plain,
    ! [U_364,X_365,Y_366] :
      ( ( inner_pasch(U_364,X_365,Y_366,Y_366,X_365) = X_365 )
      | ~ between(U_364,X_365,Y_366) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_1461]) ).

tff(c_1594,plain,
    inner_pasch(w,v,u,u,v) = v,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_1570]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [V_39,W_35,U_36,X_37,Y_38] :
      ( between(X_37,inner_pasch(U_36,V_39,W_35,X_37,Y_38),U_36)
      | ~ between(Y_38,X_37,W_35)
      | ~ between(U_36,V_39,W_35) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_126]) ).

tff(c_1601,plain,
    ( between(u,v,w)
    | ~ between(v,u,u)
    | ~ between(w,v,u) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1594,c_18]) ).

tff(c_1607,plain,
    between(u,v,w),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_46,c_89,c_1601]) ).

tff(c_1609,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_1607]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO064-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:42:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.81/2.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.81/2.20  
% 4.81/2.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.81/2.23  
% 4.81/2.23  Inference rules
% 4.81/2.23  ----------------------
% 4.81/2.23  #Ref     : 0
% 4.81/2.23  #Sup     : 362
% 4.81/2.23  #Fact    : 0
% 4.81/2.23  #Define  : 0
% 4.81/2.23  #Split   : 0
% 4.81/2.23  #Chain   : 0
% 4.81/2.23  #Close   : 0
% 4.81/2.23  
% 4.81/2.23  Ordering : KBO
% 4.81/2.23  
% 4.81/2.23  Simplification rules
% 4.81/2.23  ----------------------
% 4.81/2.23  #Subsume      : 6
% 4.81/2.23  #Demod        : 290
% 4.81/2.23  #Tautology    : 189
% 4.81/2.23  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 4.81/2.23  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.81/2.23  
% 4.81/2.23  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.81/2.23  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.81/2.23  
% 4.81/2.23  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.81/2.23  ----------------------
% 4.81/2.23  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 4.81/2.23  Parsing              : 0.28
% 4.81/2.23  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.81/2.23  Main loop            : 0.65
% 4.81/2.23  Inferencing          : 0.25
% 4.81/2.23  Reduction            : 0.19
% 4.81/2.23  Demodulation         : 0.14
% 4.81/2.23  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.81/2.23  Subsumption          : 0.14
% 4.81/2.23  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 4.81/2.23  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.81/2.23  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.81/2.23  Total                : 1.20
% 4.81/2.23  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.81/2.23  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.81/2.23  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.81/2.23  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------