TSTP Solution File: GEO062-3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GEO062-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:31:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 15 unt; 3 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 13 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(b5,axiom,
( between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p',b5) ).
cnf(segment_construction1,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p',segment_construction1) ).
cnf(t1,axiom,
( between(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p',t1) ).
cnf(v_between_u_and_w,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p',v_between_u_and_w) ).
cnf(prove_v_equals_insertion,negated_conjecture,
v != insertion(u,w,u,v),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p',prove_v_equals_insertion) ).
cnf(insertion,axiom,
insertion(X1,X2,X3,X4) = extension(extension(X2,X1,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),X1,X3,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p',insertion) ).
cnf(d10_1,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = extension(X1,X2,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p',d10_1) ).
cnf(e3_1,axiom,
X1 != extension(X2,X1,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p',e3_1) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4) ),
b5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
segment_construction1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( between(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
t1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
v_between_u_and_w ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( between(X1,X2,extension(X3,X2,X4,X5))
| ~ between(X3,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
between(w,v,u),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
between(v,u,extension(w,u,X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
v != insertion(u,w,u,v),
prove_v_equals_insertion ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
insertion(X1,X2,X3,X4) = extension(extension(X2,X1,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),X1,X3,X4),
insertion ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = extension(X1,X2,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
d10_1 ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
between(extension(w,u,X1,X2),u,v),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
v != extension(extension(w,u,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),u,u,v),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
( extension(extension(w,u,X1,X2),u,u,v) = v
| extension(w,u,X1,X2) = u ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
X1 != extension(X2,X1,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
e3_1 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : GEO062-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.04/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:16:05 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oS5ZOIOutA/E---3.1_13128.p
% 0.49/0.55 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.49/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 13206 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.49/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.49/0.55 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 901s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 151s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 151s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 146s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with pid 13212 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.49/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.49/0.55 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.49/0.55 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 901s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.49/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.49/0.55
% 0.49/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.49/0.55 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 75
% 0.49/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Initial clauses : 75
% 0.49/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.49/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 72
% 0.49/0.55 # Processed clauses : 305
% 0.49/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.49/0.55 # ...subsumed : 93
% 0.49/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 200
% 0.49/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.49/0.55 # Generated clauses : 711
% 0.49/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 429
% 0.49/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Paramodulations : 702
% 0.49/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.49/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 298
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 127
% 0.49/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.49/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.49/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 88
% 0.49/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 255
% 0.49/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 690
% 0.49/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 75
% 0.49/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3249
% 0.49/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2733
% 0.49/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 93
% 0.49/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.49/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 202
% 0.49/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.49/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.49/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8876
% 0.49/0.55
% 0.49/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.55 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.49/0.55 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.49/0.55 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.49/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.49/0.55
% 0.49/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.55 # User time : 0.112 s
% 0.49/0.55 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.49/0.55 # Total time : 0.121 s
% 0.49/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.49/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.49/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------