TSTP Solution File: GEO059-3 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : GEO059-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:53:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.91s 1.20s
% Output : Refutation 0.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : GEO059-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:11:29 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.91/1.20 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.91/1.20 Process 27097 was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.91/1.20 Sat Jun 18 14:11:29 2022
% 0.91/1.20 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_26944_n013.cluster.edu".
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_26944_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.91/1.20 set(auto2).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.91/1.20 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.91/1.20 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.91/1.20 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.91/1.20 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.91/1.20 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.91/1.20 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.91/1.20 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.91/1.20 clear(print_given).
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (42 formulas)
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.91/1.20 Function symbol KB weights: lower_dimension_point_1=1. lower_dimension_point_2=1. lower_dimension_point_3=1. u=1. v=1. reflection=1. extension=1. euclid1=1. euclid2=1. inner_pasch=1. continuous=1.
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.91/1.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.91/1.20 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 % Proof 1 at 0.15 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.91/1.20 % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.91/1.20 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.91/1.20 % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 0.91/1.20 % Given clauses 53.
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 11 equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D) # label(segment_construction2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.91/1.20 12 reflection(A,B) = extension(A,B,A,B) # label(reflection) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.91/1.20 18 -equidistant(v,u,v,reflection(reflection(u,v),v)) # label(prove_congruence) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.91/1.20 19 -equidistant(v,u,v,extension(extension(u,v,u,v),v,extension(u,v,u,v),v)). [copy(18),rewrite([12(6),12(10)])].
% 0.91/1.20 26 -equidistant(A,B,C,D) | equidistant(C,D,A,B) # label(d2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.91/1.20 32 -equidistant(A,B,C,D) | equidistant(D,C,B,A) # label(d4_5) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.91/1.20 38 -equidistant(A,B,C,D) | -equidistant(C,D,E,F) | equidistant(A,B,E,F) # label(d5) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.91/1.20 77 equidistant(A,B,C,extension(D,C,A,B)). [resolve(26,a,11,a)].
% 0.91/1.20 89 equidistant(A,B,extension(C,D,B,A),D). [resolve(32,a,11,a)].
% 0.91/1.20 213 $F. [ur(38,b,77,a,c,19,a),unit_del(a,89)].
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 Given=53. Generated=433. Kept=204. proofs=1.
% 0.91/1.20 Usable=52. Sos=118. Demods=2. Limbo=17, Disabled=59. Hints=0.
% 0.91/1.20 Megabytes=0.24.
% 0.91/1.20 User_CPU=0.15, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=1.
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.91/1.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.91/1.20
% 0.91/1.20 Process 27097 exit (max_proofs) Sat Jun 18 14:11:30 2022
% 0.91/1.20 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------