%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : GEO054-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:11:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    8 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f23]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ~ between(u,v,sF0),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f21,f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    sF0 = extension(u,v,u,v),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ~ between(u,v,extension(u,v,u,v)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f20,f19]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    ! [X3,X10] : reflection(X10,X3) = extension(X10,X3,X10,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflection) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ~ between(u,v,reflection(u,v)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_v_between_u_and_reflection) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    between(u,v,sF0),
    inference(superposition,[],[f4,f22]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X3,X0,X1,X5] : between(X0,X1,extension(X0,X1,X5,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',segment_construction1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO054-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 21:06:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  % (13966)ott+10_1:8_bsd=on:fsd=on:lcm=predicate:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:spb=goal_then_units:i=176:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/176Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (13974)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (13974)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)Time elapsed: 0.079 s
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (13974)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (13945)Success in time 0.14 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------