TSTP Solution File: GEO053-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO053-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GEO053-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:07:32 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.16/0.34 The process was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.16/0.34 Fri Jun 17 16:07:32 2022
% 0.16/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23913.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.16/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.16/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.16/0.34 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.16/0.34 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.16/0.34 clauses in usable.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(B,A,C)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(A,C,B)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.16/0.34 111 back subsumes 88.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 128 during input processing: 0 [demod,131] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [demod,131] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 128 during input processing: 0 [] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 139 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.16/0.34 127 back subsumes 125.
% 0.16/0.34 127 back subsumes 124.
% 0.16/0.34 127 back subsumes 123.
% 0.16/0.34 127 back subsumes 121.
% 0.16/0.34 127 back subsumes 120.
% 0.16/0.34 127 back subsumes 113.
% 0.16/0.34 134 back subsumes 97.
% 0.16/0.34 134 back subsumes 84.
% 0.16/0.34 134 back subsumes 71.
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 139 during input processing: 0 [copy,139,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.16/0.34 139 back subsumes 87.
% 0.16/0.34 139 back subsumes 86.
% 0.16/0.34 139 back subsumes 85.
% 0.16/0.34 140 back subsumes 100.
% 0.16/0.34 140 back subsumes 99.
% 0.16/0.34 140 back subsumes 98.
% 0.16/0.34 140 back subsumes 94.
% 0.16/0.34 140 back subsumes 93.
% 0.16/0.34 140 back subsumes 72.
% 0.16/0.34 147 back subsumes 110.
% 0.16/0.34 147 back subsumes 108.
% 0.16/0.34 147 back subsumes 107.
% 0.16/0.34 147 back subsumes 105.
% 0.16/0.34 147 back subsumes 104.
% 0.16/0.34 147 back subsumes 76.
% 0.16/0.34 147 back subsumes 75.
% 0.16/0.34 148 back subsumes 111.
% 0.16/0.34 148 back subsumes 109.
% 0.16/0.34 148 back subsumes 106.
% 0.16/0.34 148 back subsumes 77.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.16/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.16/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.16/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 81
% 0.16/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 108
% 0.16/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 75
% 0.16/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 0.16/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.16/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.16/0.41 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.16/0.41 distinct function count: 7
% 0.16/0.41 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.16/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.15 sec ----> 777 [binary,775.1,70.1] {-} $F.
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 2.
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.16/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 54 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,F)| -equidistant(A,B,D,E)| -equidistant(A,C,D,F)|equidistant(B,C,E,F).
% 0.16/0.51 56 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -equidistant(A,B,A,D)| -equidistant(C,B,C,D)|B=D.
% 0.16/0.51 69 [] {-} v!=w.
% 0.16/0.51 70 [copy,69,flip.1] {+} w!=v.
% 0.16/0.51 103 [factor,56.2.3] {+} -between(A,B,A)| -equidistant(A,B,A,C)|B=C.
% 0.16/0.51 134 [] {-} equidistant(A,B,A,B).
% 0.16/0.51 147 [] {-} between(A,B,B).
% 0.16/0.51 148 [] {-} between(A,A,B).
% 0.16/0.51 152 [] {-} between(u,v,w).
% 0.16/0.51 153 [] {-} equidistant(u,v,u,w).
% 0.16/0.51 575 [hyper,153,54,147,152,134] {-} equidistant(v,v,v,w).
% 0.16/0.51 775 [hyper,575,103,148,flip.1] {-} w=v.
% 0.16/0.51 777 [binary,775.1,70.1] {-} $F.
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.16/0.51 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 ============ end of search ============
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.16/0.51
% 0.16/0.51 Process 23913 finished Fri Jun 17 16:07:32 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------