TSTP Solution File: GEO053-3 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : GEO053-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:53:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.55s 1.87s
% Output : Refutation 1.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : GEO053-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:04:31 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 1.55/1.87 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 1.55/1.87 Process 6576 was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 1.55/1.87 Fri Jun 17 16:04:31 2022
% 1.55/1.87 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_6423_n032.cluster.edu".
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_6423_n032.cluster.edu
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.55/1.87 set(auto2).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 1.55/1.87 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 1.55/1.87 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 1.55/1.87 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 1.55/1.87 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 1.55/1.87 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 1.55/1.87 assign(order,kbo).
% 1.55/1.87 set(lex_order_vars).
% 1.55/1.87 clear(print_given).
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (85 formulas)
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 Term ordering decisions:
% 1.55/1.87 Function symbol KB weights: lower_dimension_point_1=1. lower_dimension_point_2=1. u=1. v=1. w=1. lower_dimension_point_3=1. reflection=1. extension=1. insertion=1. inner_pasch=1. euclid1=1. euclid2=1. continuous=1.
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.55/1.87 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.55/1.87 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 % Proof 1 at 1.06 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 1.55/1.87 % Length of proof is 11.
% 1.55/1.87 % Level of proof is 3.
% 1.55/1.87 % Maximum clause weight is 23.000.
% 1.55/1.87 % Given clauses 126.
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 3 between(u,v,w) # label(v_between_u_and_w) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 1.55/1.87 4 equidistant(A,B,B,A) # label(reflexivity_for_equidistance) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.55/1.87 9 equidistant(u,v,u,w) # label(u_to_v_equals_u_to_w) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 1.55/1.87 32 v != w # label(prove_v_equals_w) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.55/1.87 33 w != v. [copy(32),flip(a)].
% 1.55/1.87 46 -equidistant(A,B,C,D) | equidistant(C,D,A,B) # label(d2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.55/1.87 57 -between(A,B,C) | -between(A,C,B) | B = C # label(b3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.55/1.87 91 -equidistant(A,B,C,D) | -equidistant(B,E,D,F) | -equidistant(A,E,C,F) | -between(A,B,E) | between(C,D,F) # label(b11) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.55/1.87 173 equidistant(u,w,u,v). [resolve(46,a,9,a)].
% 1.55/1.87 210 -between(u,w,v). [resolve(57,a,3,a),flip(b),unit_del(b,33)].
% 1.55/1.87 1123 $F. [ur(91,b,4,a,c,173,a,d,3,a,e,210,a),unit_del(a,9)].
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 Given=126. Generated=2879. Kept=1104. proofs=1.
% 1.55/1.87 Usable=125. Sos=945. Demods=15. Limbo=0, Disabled=119. Hints=0.
% 1.55/1.87 Megabytes=1.11.
% 1.55/1.87 User_CPU=1.06, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1.
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 THEOREM PROVED
% 1.55/1.87 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.55/1.87
% 1.55/1.87 Process 6576 exit (max_proofs) Fri Jun 17 16:04:32 2022
% 1.55/1.87 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------