TSTP Solution File: GEO049-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO049-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 64.50s 64.70s
% Output   : Refutation 64.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : GEO049-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:09:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sat Jun 18 10:09:58 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 4369.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36  35 back subsumes 32.
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 42 during input processing: 0 [copy,42,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.05/1.25  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.05/1.25  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.05/1.25  number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 1.05/1.25  number of clauses initially in problem: 41
% 1.05/1.25  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 1.05/1.25  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 76
% 1.05/1.25  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.05/1.25  absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 1.05/1.25     distinct predicate count: 3
% 1.05/1.25     distinct function count: 5
% 1.05/1.25     distinct constant count: 9
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  =========== start of search ===========
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Model 2 [ 1 68 244682 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Model 3 [ 3 53 192595 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Model 5 [ 36 42 153687 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.03/10.25  
% 10.03/10.25  Resetting weight limit to 59 after 45 givens.
% 10.03/10.25  
% 33.02/33.23  
% 33.02/33.23  
% 33.02/33.23  Changing weight limit from 59 to 38.
% 33.02/33.23  
% 33.02/33.23  Resetting weight limit to 38 after 85 givens.
% 33.02/33.23  
% 35.28/35.50  
% 35.28/35.50  
% 35.28/35.50  Changing weight limit from 38 to 31.
% 35.28/35.50  
% 35.28/35.50  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 90 givens.
% 35.28/35.50  
% 35.97/36.16  
% 35.97/36.16  
% 35.97/36.16  Changing weight limit from 31 to 28.
% 35.97/36.16  
% 35.97/36.16  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 95 givens.
% 35.97/36.16  
% 37.02/37.21  
% 37.02/37.21  
% 37.02/37.21  Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 37.02/37.21  
% 37.02/37.21  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 105 givens.
% 37.02/37.21  
% 38.30/38.53  
% 38.30/38.53  
% 38.30/38.53  Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 38.30/38.53  
% 38.30/38.53  Resetting weight limit to 26 after 120 givens.
% 38.30/38.53  
% 40.45/40.74  
% 40.45/40.74  
% 40.45/40.74  Changing weight limit from 26 to 24.
% 40.45/40.74  
% 40.45/40.74  Resetting weight limit to 24 after 160 givens.
% 40.45/40.74  
% 40.69/40.95  
% 40.69/40.95  
% 40.69/40.95  Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 40.69/40.95  
% 40.69/40.95  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 165 givens.
% 40.69/40.95  
% 41.10/41.32  
% 41.10/41.32  
% 41.10/41.32  Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 41.10/41.32  
% 41.10/41.32  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 180 givens.
% 41.10/41.32  
% 43.78/43.96  
% 43.78/43.96  
% 43.78/43.96  Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 43.78/43.96  
% 43.78/43.96  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 270 givens.
% 43.78/43.96  
% 46.12/46.35  
% 46.12/46.35  
% 46.12/46.35  Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 46.12/46.35  
% 46.12/46.35  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 46.12/46.35  
% 46.12/46.35  Model 6 [ 47 69 248537 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 46.12/46.35  
% 46.12/46.35  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 325 givens.
% 46.12/46.35  
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 7 [ 58 50 181089 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 8 [ 164 99 231310 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 9 [ 184 48 173194 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 10 [ 202 74 184764 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 11 [ 332 9 39130 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 12 [ 175 24 110990 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 13 [ 359 6 11977 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 14 [ 184 37 148698 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Model 15 [ 393 9 20580 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.17/60.36  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 540 givens.
% 60.17/60.36  
% 60.22/60.42  
% 60.22/60.42  
% 60.22/60.42  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 60.22/60.42  
% 60.22/60.42  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 545 givens.
% 60.22/60.42  
% 60.27/60.48  
% 60.27/60.48  
% 60.27/60.48  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 60.27/60.48  
% 60.27/60.48  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 550 givens.
% 60.27/60.48  
% 60.36/60.54  
% 60.36/60.54  
% 60.36/60.54  Changing weight limit from 17 to 15.
% 60.36/60.54  
% 60.36/60.54  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 555 givens.
% 60.36/60.54  
% 60.56/60.74  
% 60.56/60.74  
% 60.56/60.74  Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 60.56/60.74  
% 60.56/60.74  Resetting weight limit to 14 after 570 givens.
% 60.56/60.74  
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  64.23 sec ----> 27568 [binary,27567.1,16.1] {+} $F.
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  Length of proof is 20.  Level of proof is 9.
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 64.50/64.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 64.50/64.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  1 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)| -equidistant(A,B,E,F)|equidistant(C,D,E,F).
% 64.50/64.70  2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 64.50/64.70  3 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)| -equidistant(B,E,D,F)| -equidistant(A,G,C,H)| -equidistant(B,G,D,H)| -between(A,B,E)| -between(C,D,F)|A=B|equidistant(E,G,F,H).
% 64.50/64.70  4 [] {+} -between(A,B,A)|A=B.
% 64.50/64.70  5 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(B,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),D).
% 64.50/64.70  6 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(E,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),A).
% 64.50/64.70  16 [] {+} -between(u1,v1,w1).
% 64.50/64.70  17 [factor,1.1.2] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)|equidistant(C,D,C,D).
% 64.50/64.70  35 [] {-} equidistant(A,B,B,A).
% 64.50/64.70  36 [] {+} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 64.50/64.70  37 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 64.50/64.70  38 [] {-} equidistant(u,v,u1,v1).
% 64.50/64.70  39 [] {-} equidistant(v,w,v1,w1).
% 64.50/64.70  40 [] {-} equidistant(u,w,u1,w1).
% 64.50/64.70  41 [] {+} between(u,v,w).
% 64.50/64.70  43 [hyper,35,17] {+} equidistant(A,B,A,B).
% 64.50/64.70  269 [para_into,36.1.3,2.2.1] {+} between(A,B,C)| -equidistant(extension(A,B,D,E),C,F,F).
% 64.50/64.70  347 [hyper,43,1,40] {-} equidistant(u1,w1,u,w).
% 64.50/64.70  348 [hyper,43,1,39] {-} equidistant(v1,w1,v,w).
% 64.50/64.70  349 [hyper,43,1,38] {+} equidistant(u1,v1,u,v).
% 64.50/64.70  496,495 [hyper,37,2,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 64.50/64.70  2015 [hyper,349,3,37,347,348,36,41,flip.1] {-} v1=u1|equidistant(extension(u1,v1,v,w),w1,w,w).
% 64.50/64.70  4854 [para_into,495.1.1,4.2.1,demod,496,496] {+} A=B| -between(B,A,B).
% 64.50/64.70  4858 [para_from,495.1.1,36.1.3] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 64.50/64.70  5343 [hyper,4858,6,4858] {-} between(A,inner_pasch(B,A,A,A,C),B).
% 64.50/64.70  7033 [para_from,4854.1.1,16.1.1] {+} -between(A,v1,w1)| -between(A,u1,A).
% 64.50/64.70  11181 [para_into,7033.1.2,4.2.1] {+} -between(A,B,w1)| -between(A,u1,A)| -between(v1,B,v1).
% 64.50/64.70  11220 [factor,11181.2.3] {+} -between(v1,u1,w1)| -between(v1,u1,v1).
% 64.50/64.70  15244 [para_into,11220.1.1,4.2.1] {+} -between(A,u1,w1)| -between(v1,u1,v1)| -between(v1,A,v1).
% 64.50/64.70  15275 [factor,15244.2.3] {+} -between(u1,u1,w1)| -between(v1,u1,v1).
% 64.50/64.70  20708 [hyper,5343,4854] {-} inner_pasch(A,A,A,A,B)=A.
% 64.50/64.70  20743 [para_from,20708.1.1,5.3.2,unit_del,4858,4858] {-} between(A,A,B).
% 64.50/64.70  26799 [para_from,2015.1.1,15275.2.3,unit_del,20743,4858] {-} equidistant(extension(u1,v1,v,w),w1,w,w).
% 64.50/64.70  27567 [hyper,26799,269] {-} between(u1,v1,w1).
% 64.50/64.70  27568 [binary,27567.1,16.1] {+} $F.
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  % SZS output end Refutation
% 64.50/64.70  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  ============ end of search ============
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  true clauses given         203      (25.4%)
% 64.50/64.70  false clauses given        597
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70        FALSE     TRUE
% 64.50/64.70     9  4         166
% 64.50/64.70    10  141       89
% 64.50/64.70    11  4         5
% 64.50/64.70    12  122       579
% 64.50/64.70    13  2135      1661
% 64.50/64.70    14  94        0
% 64.50/64.70  tot:  2500      2500      (50.0% true)
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  Model 15 [ 393 9 20580 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 64.50/64.70  
% 64.50/64.70  Process 4369 finished Sat Jun 18 10:11:02 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------