TSTP Solution File: GEO048-3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO048-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(t1,axiom,
( between(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ6nQh18U2/E---3.1_11065.p',t1) ).
cnf(v_between_u_and_w,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ6nQh18U2/E---3.1_11065.p',v_between_u_and_w) ).
cnf(prove_conclusion2,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,inner_pasch(v1,inner_pasch(u,x,u1,v1,w),u,v,w),v1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ6nQh18U2/E---3.1_11065.p',prove_conclusion2) ).
cnf(inner_pasch2,axiom,
( between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X4,X5,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ6nQh18U2/E---3.1_11065.p',inner_pasch2) ).
cnf(v1_between_u1_and_w,hypothesis,
between(u1,v1,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ6nQh18U2/E---3.1_11065.p',v1_between_u1_and_w) ).
cnf(x_between_u_and_u1,hypothesis,
between(u,x,u1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ6nQh18U2/E---3.1_11065.p',x_between_u_and_u1) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( between(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
t1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
v_between_u_and_w ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,inner_pasch(v1,inner_pasch(u,x,u1,v1,w),u,v,w),v1),
prove_conclusion2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X4,X5,X3) ),
inner_pasch2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
between(w,v,u),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
between(u1,v1,w),
v1_between_u1_and_w ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v1,inner_pasch(u,x,u1,v1,w),u),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
between(w,v1,u1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
between(u,x,u1),
x_between_u_and_u1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO048-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:31:51 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ6nQh18U2/E---3.1_11065.p
% 0.19/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 11144 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.50 # Search class: FGUSS-FFMS33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 150s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with pid 11147 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI
% 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.50 # Search class: FGUSS-FFMS33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 150s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 68
% 0.19/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 46
% 0.19/0.50 # Initial clauses : 22
% 0.19/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.19/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.19/0.50 # Processed clauses : 46
% 0.19/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.19/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.19/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.19/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Generated clauses : 85
% 0.19/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 71
% 0.19/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Paramodulations : 84
% 0.19/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.19/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 13
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.19/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.19/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.19/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.19/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 180
% 0.19/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.19/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 272
% 0.19/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 242
% 0.19/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.19/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.19/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1560
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.50 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.19/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------