TSTP Solution File: GEO047-3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO047-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.87s 3.10s
% Output   : Refutation 2.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO047-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:56:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37  Sat Jun 18 10:56:12 2022
% 0.20/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 32743.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(B,A,C)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(A,C,B)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [demod,68] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [demod,68] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.37  64 back subsumes 61.
% 0.20/0.37  69 back subsumes 56.
% 0.20/0.37  69 back subsumes 43.
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [copy,74,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.37  74 back subsumes 59.
% 0.20/0.37  74 back subsumes 58.
% 0.20/0.37  74 back subsumes 57.
% 0.20/0.37  75 back subsumes 44.
% 0.20/0.37  82 back subsumes 60.
% 0.20/0.37  82 back subsumes 48.
% 0.20/0.37  82 back subsumes 47.
% 0.20/0.37  83 back subsumes 49.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/0.94  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/0.94  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/0.94  number of clauses in intial UL: 47
% 0.76/0.94  number of clauses initially in problem: 66
% 0.76/0.94  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 0.76/0.94  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.76/0.94  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.76/0.94  absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.76/0.94     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.76/0.94     distinct function count: 6
% 0.76/0.94     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.94  
% 0.76/0.94  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.87/3.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.87/3.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Model 4 [ 3 25 99240 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Model 5 [ 1 35 134394 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Model 6 [ 2 30 125639 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.72 sec ----> 426 [binary,425.1,42.1] {-} $F.
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.87/3.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.87/3.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  35 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)|between(C,B,A).
% 2.87/3.10  41 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(B,D,C)|between(A,D,C).
% 2.87/3.10  42 [] {+} -between(u,v,x).
% 2.87/3.10  84 [] {+} between(u,v,w).
% 2.87/3.10  85 [] {+} between(u,w,x).
% 2.87/3.10  92 [hyper,84,35] {+} between(w,v,u).
% 2.87/3.10  156 [hyper,85,35] {+} between(x,w,u).
% 2.87/3.10  342 [hyper,156,41,92] {-} between(x,v,u).
% 2.87/3.10  425 [hyper,342,35] {-} between(u,v,x).
% 2.87/3.10  426 [binary,425.1,42.1] {-} $F.
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.87/3.10  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  ============ end of search ============
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10  true clauses given           2      (25.0%)
% 2.87/3.10  false clauses given          6
% 2.87/3.10  
% 2.87/3.10        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.87/3.10     4  0         3
% 2.87/3.10     5  1         1
% 2.87/3.11     7  1         0
% 2.87/3.11     8  6         11
% 2.87/3.11     9  9         13
% 2.87/3.11    10  4         2
% 2.87/3.11    11  2         6
% 2.87/3.11    12  17        19
% 2.87/3.11    13  0         2
% 2.87/3.11    14  0         1
% 2.87/3.11    15  7         6
% 2.87/3.11    16  17        21
% 2.87/3.11    17  7         13
% 2.87/3.11    18  0         1
% 2.87/3.11    19  0         1
% 2.87/3.11    20  20        23
% 2.87/3.11    21  12        12
% 2.87/3.11    22  6         6
% 2.87/3.11    23  6         8
% 2.87/3.11    24  0         2
% 2.87/3.11    25  2         2
% 2.87/3.11    26  6         6
% 2.87/3.11    27  6         6
% 2.87/3.11    28  0         4
% 2.87/3.11    29  1         3
% 2.87/3.11    31  6         6
% 2.87/3.11    33  0         3
% 2.87/3.11    35  0         1
% 2.87/3.11    37  6         7
% 2.87/3.11    38  0         1
% 2.87/3.11    39  0         1
% 2.87/3.11    42  0         1
% 2.87/3.11    43  0         1
% 2.87/3.11    49  0         1
% 2.87/3.11  tot:  142       194      (57.7% true)
% 2.87/3.11  
% 2.87/3.11  
% 2.87/3.11  Model 6 [ 2 -10 125639 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.87/3.11  
% 2.87/3.11  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.87/3.11  
% 2.87/3.11  Process 32743 finished Sat Jun 18 10:56:15 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------