TSTP Solution File: GEO047-3 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : GEO047-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:53:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : GEO047-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 11:31:32 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.53/0.90 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.53/0.90 Process 16601 was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.53/0.90 Sat Jun 18 11:31:32 2022
% 0.53/0.90 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_16448_n032.cluster.edu".
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_16448_n032.cluster.edu
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.53/0.90 set(auto2).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.53/0.90 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.53/0.90 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.53/0.90 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.53/0.90 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.53/0.90 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.53/0.90 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.53/0.90 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.53/0.90 clear(print_given).
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (59 formulas)
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.53/0.90 Function symbol KB weights: u=1. w=1. v=1. x=1. lower_dimension_point_1=1. lower_dimension_point_2=1. lower_dimension_point_3=1. reflection=1. extension=1. euclid1=1. euclid2=1. inner_pasch=1. continuous=1.
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.53/0.90 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.90 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 % Proof 1 at 0.11 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.53/0.90 % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.53/0.90 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.53/0.90 % Maximum clause weight is 12.000.
% 0.53/0.90 % Given clauses 73.
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 3 between(u,v,w) # label(v_between_u_and_w) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.53/0.90 4 between(u,w,x) # label(w_between_u_and_x) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.53/0.90 26 -between(u,v,x) # label(prove_v_between_u_and_x) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.53/0.90 33 -between(A,B,C) | between(C,B,A) # label(t1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.53/0.90 47 -between(A,B,C) | -between(B,D,C) | between(A,D,C) # label(b8) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.53/0.90 83 between(x,w,u). [resolve(33,a,4,a)].
% 0.53/0.90 84 between(w,v,u). [resolve(33,a,3,a)].
% 0.53/0.90 85 -between(x,v,u). [ur(33,b,26,a)].
% 0.53/0.90 365 $F. [ur(47,b,84,a,c,85,a),unit_del(a,83)].
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 Given=73. Generated=776. Kept=355. proofs=1.
% 0.53/0.90 Usable=72. Sos=267. Demods=3. Limbo=1, Disabled=74. Hints=0.
% 0.53/0.90 Megabytes=0.37.
% 0.53/0.90 User_CPU=0.11, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.53/0.90 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.53/0.90
% 0.53/0.90 Process 16601 exit (max_proofs) Sat Jun 18 11:31:32 2022
% 0.53/0.90 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------