TSTP Solution File: GEO045-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO045-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.66s 4.87s
% Output : Refutation 4.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO045-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:52:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36 Sat Jun 18 14:52:07 2022
% 0.14/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 32061.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(B,A,C)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.14/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(A,C,B)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [demod,68] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.14/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [demod,68] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.14/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.36 64 back subsumes 61.
% 0.14/0.36 69 back subsumes 56.
% 0.14/0.36 69 back subsumes 43.
% 0.14/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [copy,74,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.36 74 back subsumes 59.
% 0.14/0.36 74 back subsumes 58.
% 0.14/0.36 74 back subsumes 57.
% 0.14/0.36 75 back subsumes 44.
% 0.14/0.36 82 back subsumes 60.
% 0.14/0.36 82 back subsumes 48.
% 0.14/0.36 82 back subsumes 47.
% 0.14/0.36 83 back subsumes 49.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.78/0.95 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.78/0.95 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.78/0.95 number of clauses in intial UL: 46
% 0.78/0.95 number of clauses initially in problem: 65
% 0.78/0.95 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 0.78/0.95 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.78/0.95 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.78/0.95 absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.78/0.95 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.78/0.95 distinct function count: 6
% 0.78/0.95 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.78/0.95
% 0.78/0.95 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 -------- PROOF --------
% 4.66/4.87 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.66/4.87 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Model 3 [ 1 22 104428 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Model 4 [ 2 21 101831 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Model 5 [ 2 25 114081 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Model 6 [ 56 14 70189 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Model 7 [ 40 22 112327 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 4.49 sec ----> 1652 [binary,1651.1,42.1] {-} $F.
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 3.
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.66/4.87 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.66/4.87 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 35 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)|between(C,B,A).
% 4.66/4.87 39 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(B,C,D)|between(A,C,D)|B=C.
% 4.66/4.87 40 [] {-} v!=w.
% 4.66/4.87 41 [copy,40,flip.1] {+} w!=v.
% 4.66/4.87 42 [] {+} -between(u,v,x).
% 4.66/4.87 84 [] {-} between(u,v,w).
% 4.66/4.87 85 [] {+} between(v,w,x).
% 4.66/4.87 92 [hyper,84,35] {-} between(w,v,u).
% 4.66/4.87 153 [hyper,85,35] {+} between(x,w,v).
% 4.66/4.87 1434 [hyper,153,39,92,unit_del,41] {-} between(x,v,u).
% 4.66/4.87 1651 [hyper,1434,35] {-} between(u,v,x).
% 4.66/4.87 1652 [binary,1651.1,42.1] {-} $F.
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.66/4.87 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 ============ end of search ============
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 true clauses given 6 (22.2%)
% 4.66/4.87 false clauses given 21
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 FALSE TRUE
% 4.66/4.87 4 0 1
% 4.66/4.87 7 0 2
% 4.66/4.87 8 4 26
% 4.66/4.87 9 36 67
% 4.66/4.87 10 4 20
% 4.66/4.87 11 31 21
% 4.66/4.87 12 56 53
% 4.66/4.87 13 36 14
% 4.66/4.87 14 9 8
% 4.66/4.87 15 43 15
% 4.66/4.87 16 76 35
% 4.66/4.87 17 26 43
% 4.66/4.87 18 9 4
% 4.66/4.87 19 16 25
% 4.66/4.87 20 49 45
% 4.66/4.87 21 46 37
% 4.66/4.87 22 28 13
% 4.66/4.87 23 13 21
% 4.66/4.87 24 59 42
% 4.66/4.87 25 69 4
% 4.66/4.87 26 42 19
% 4.66/4.87 27 21 32
% 4.66/4.87 28 3 8
% 4.66/4.87 29 11 6
% 4.66/4.87 30 38 1
% 4.66/4.87 31 40 10
% 4.66/4.87 32 3 0
% 4.66/4.87 33 3 10
% 4.66/4.87 34 8 0
% 4.66/4.87 35 39 1
% 4.66/4.87 36 1 1
% 4.66/4.87 37 9 40
% 4.66/4.87 38 0 1
% 4.66/4.87 39 2 1
% 4.66/4.87 40 11 0
% 4.66/4.87 41 31 0
% 4.66/4.87 42 4 1
% 4.66/4.87 43 1 1
% 4.66/4.87 44 2 0
% 4.66/4.87 45 3 1
% 4.66/4.87 46 1 0
% 4.66/4.87 47 1 0
% 4.66/4.87 48 0 4
% 4.66/4.87 49 2 1
% 4.66/4.87 50 3 0
% 4.66/4.87 51 1 0
% 4.66/4.87 56 2 0
% 4.66/4.87 tot: 892 634 (41.5% true)
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Model 7 [ 40 -72 112327 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.66/4.87
% 4.66/4.87 Process 32061 finished Sat Jun 18 14:52:12 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------