TSTP Solution File: GEO045-3 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : GEO045-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:07:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GEO045-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:45:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.14/0.39 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.14/0.39 #
% 0.14/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.39 # Number of axioms: 56 Number of unprocessed: 48
% 0.14/0.39 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.14/0.39 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.14/0.39 # Hello from C++
% 0.14/0.40 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.14/0.40 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.14/0.40 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.14/0.40 # 48 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.14/0.40 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.14/0.40 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.14/0.40 # Found 16 unit axioms.
% 0.14/0.40 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.14/0.40 # 32 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.14/0.40 # 16 unit axiom clauses
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.14/0.40 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.14/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # End clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_113, hypothesis, (between(u,v,w))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_114, hypothesis, (between(v,w,x))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_102, plain, (between(X1,X2,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_105, plain, (between(X1,X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (equidistant(X1,X1,X2,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_87, plain, (extension(X1,X2,X3,X3)=X2)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_101, plain, (extension(extension(X1,X2,X1,X2),X2,extension(X1,X2,X1,X2),X2)=X1)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_115, hypothesis, (w!=v)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_116, negated_conjecture, (~between(u,v,x))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (X1=X2|~between(X1,X2,X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (X1=X2|~equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (X1=X2|extension(X2,X1,X2,X1)!=X1)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_104, plain, (between(X1,X2,X3)|~between(X3,X2,X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_107, plain, (X1=X2|~between(X3,X2,X1)|~between(X3,X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_106, plain, (X1=X2|~between(X2,X1,X3)|~between(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_111, plain, (between(X1,X2,X3)|~between(X4,X2,X3)|~between(X4,X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X4,X3,X2,X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X3,X4,X2,X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X4,X3,X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X3,X4,X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_97, plain, (extension(X1,X2,X2,X3)=X3|X1=X2|~between(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X2,X1,X4,X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X2,X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X4,X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_112, plain, (X1=X2|between(X3,X2,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X4)|~between(X3,X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_99, plain, (extension(X1,X2,X1,X2)=extension(X1,X2,X2,X1)|X1=X2)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (X1=X2|X3=X4|~between(X1,X2,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X3)|~equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X4))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X6,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X6,X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_86, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X6,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (between(X1,inner_pasch(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5),X2)|~between(X5,X1,X4)|~between(X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (between(X1,inner_pasch(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5),X5)|~between(X5,X4,X3)|~between(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (X1=X2|between(X1,X3,euclid2(X1,X4,X2,X3,X5))|~between(X4,X2,X3)|~between(X1,X2,X5))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (X1=X2|between(X1,X3,euclid1(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5))|~between(X3,X2,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X5))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_98, plain, (extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)=extension(X1,X2,X5,X6)|X1=X2|~equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~between(X3,X5,X4)|~between(X1,X6,X2)|~equidistant(X6,X2,X5,X4)|~equidistant(X1,X6,X3,X5))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X1,continuous(X1,X3,X4,X2,X5,X6))|~between(X3,X2,X5)|~between(X1,X3,X5)|~equidistant(X1,X5,X1,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (between(X1,continuous(X2,X3,X1,X4,X5,X6),X6)|~between(X3,X4,X5)|~between(X2,X3,X5)|~equidistant(X2,X5,X2,X6)|~equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X1))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (X1=X2|between(euclid1(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5),X5,euclid2(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5))|~between(X3,X2,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X5))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (X1=X2|equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)|~between(X7,X8,X5)|~between(X1,X2,X3)|~equidistant(X2,X4,X8,X6)|~equidistant(X2,X3,X8,X5)|~equidistant(X1,X4,X7,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X7,X8))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (X1=X2|between(X3,X4,X5)|between(X4,X5,X3)|between(X5,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X1,X5,X2)|~equidistant(X4,X1,X4,X2)|~equidistant(X3,X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_103, plain, (between(X1,X2,X3)|~between(X3,X2,X3))).
% 0.14/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.14/0.40 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.14/0.40 # Found 5 steps
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_116, negated_conjecture, (~between(u,v,x)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_120, plain, (~between(u,v,x)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_103])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_224, plain, (~between(x,v,x)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_111])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_240, plain, (~between(v,v,x)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_105])).
% 0.14/0.40 cnf(i_0_241, plain, (~between(v,x,v)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_241, ...])).
% 0.14/0.40 # End printing tableau
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output end
% 0.14/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.14/0.40 # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.14/0.40 # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on
% 0.14/0.40 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.14/0.40 # Proof search is over...
% 0.14/0.40 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------