TSTP Solution File: GEO044-3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO044-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 15 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 39 ( 10 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(b5,axiom,
( between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p',b5) ).
cnf(segment_construction1,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p',segment_construction1) ).
cnf(d9,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X4
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p',d9) ).
cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p',segment_construction2) ).
cnf(v_between_u_and_w,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p',v_between_u_and_w) ).
cnf(v_not_w,hypothesis,
v != w,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p',v_not_w) ).
cnf(w_between_v_and_x,hypothesis,
between(v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p',w_between_v_and_x) ).
cnf(prove_w_between_u_and_x,negated_conjecture,
~ between(u,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p',prove_w_between_u_and_x) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4) ),
b5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
segment_construction1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X4
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X4) ),
d9 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
segment_construction2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( between(X1,X2,extension(X3,X2,X4,X5))
| ~ between(X3,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
v_between_u_and_w ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( extension(X1,X2,X2,X3) = X3
| X4 = X2
| ~ between(X4,X2,extension(X1,X2,X2,X3))
| ~ between(X4,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
between(v,w,extension(u,w,X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
v != w,
v_not_w ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
( extension(u,w,w,X1) = X1
| ~ between(v,w,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
between(v,w,x),
w_between_v_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
extension(u,w,w,x) = x,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ between(u,w,x),
prove_w_between_u_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GEO044-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:51:31 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t48FG0hwt7/E---3.1_12844.p
% 0.16/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12921 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.46 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 12932 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.46 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 57
% 0.16/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Initial clauses : 57
% 0.16/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 55
% 0.16/0.46 # Processed clauses : 250
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.16/0.46 # ...subsumed : 63
% 0.16/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 179
% 0.16/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Generated clauses : 741
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 485
% 0.16/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Paramodulations : 737
% 0.16/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 250
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 129
% 0.16/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 43
% 0.16/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 17
% 0.16/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 69
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 337
% 0.16/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 813
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 48
% 0.16/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2202
% 0.16/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1733
% 0.16/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 44
% 0.16/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 161
% 0.16/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 215
% 0.16/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9365
% 0.16/0.47
% 0.16/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.16/0.47 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.16/0.47
% 0.16/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47 # User time : 0.082 s
% 0.16/0.47 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Total time : 0.091 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.16/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------