TSTP Solution File: GEO043-2 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : GEO043-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:27:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO043-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.18/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 23:35:29 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.49  Command-line arguments: --kbo-weight0 --lhs-weight 5 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --goal-heuristic
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.50  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.21/0.51    fof(identity_for_betweeness, axiom, ![X, Y]: (~between(X, Y, X) | X=Y)).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(identity_for_equidistance, axiom, ![Z, X2, Y2]: (~equidistant(X2, Y2, Z, Z) | X2=Y2)).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(inner_pasch1, axiom, ![V, W, U, X2, Y2]: (~between(U, V, W) | (~between(Y2, X2, W) | between(V, inner_pasch(U, V, W, X2, Y2), Y2)))).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(inner_pasch2, axiom, ![V2, X2, Y2, W2, U2]: (~between(U2, V2, W2) | (~between(Y2, X2, W2) | between(X2, inner_pasch(U2, V2, W2, X2, Y2), U2)))).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(prove_w_between_v_and_x, negated_conjecture, ~between(v, w, x)).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(segment_construction1, axiom, ![V2, X2, Y2, W2]: between(X2, Y2, extension(X2, Y2, W2, V2))).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(segment_construction2, axiom, ![V2, X2, Y2, W2]: equidistant(Y2, extension(X2, Y2, W2, V2), W2, V2)).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(v_between_u_and_w, hypothesis, between(u, v, w)).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(w_between_u_and_x, hypothesis, between(u, w, x)).
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.21/0.51  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.21/0.51  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.21/0.51    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.21/0.51    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.21/0.51  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.21/0.51  variables of u and v.
% 0.21/0.51  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.21/0.51  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 1 (w_between_u_and_x): between(u, w, x) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 2 (v_between_u_and_w): between(u, v, w) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 3 (identity_for_equidistance): fresh(X, X, Y, Z) = Z.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 4 (identity_for_betweeness): fresh2(X, X, Y, Z) = Z.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 5 (segment_construction1): between(X, Y, extension(X, Y, Z, W)) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 6 (identity_for_betweeness): fresh2(between(X, Y, X), true, X, Y) = X.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 7 (segment_construction2): equidistant(X, extension(Y, X, Z, W), Z, W) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 8 (identity_for_equidistance): fresh(equidistant(X, Y, Z, Z), true, X, Y) = X.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 9 (inner_pasch1): fresh8(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U) = between(Z, inner_pasch(Y, Z, W, U, V), V).
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 10 (inner_pasch1): fresh7(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 11 (inner_pasch2): fresh6(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U) = between(U, inner_pasch(Y, Z, W, U, V), Y).
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 12 (inner_pasch2): fresh5(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 13 (inner_pasch1): fresh8(between(X, Y, Z), true, W, V, Z, X, Y) = fresh7(between(W, V, Z), true, W, V, Z, X, Y).
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 14 (inner_pasch2): fresh6(between(X, Y, Z), true, W, V, Z, X, Y) = fresh5(between(W, V, Z), true, W, V, Z, X, Y).
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Lemma 15: between(X, Y, Y) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Proof:
% 0.21/0.51    between(X, Y, Y)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 8 (identity_for_equidistance) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(X, Y, fresh(equidistant(Y, extension(X, Y, Z, Z), Z, Z), true, Y, extension(X, Y, Z, Z)))
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 7 (segment_construction2) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(X, Y, fresh(true, true, Y, extension(X, Y, Z, Z)))
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 3 (identity_for_equidistance) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(X, Y, extension(X, Y, Z, Z))
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 5 (segment_construction1) }
% 0.21/0.51    true
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Lemma 16: between(w, v, u) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Proof:
% 0.21/0.51    between(w, v, u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 6 (identity_for_betweeness) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(w, fresh2(between(v, inner_pasch(u, v, w, w, v), v), true, v, inner_pasch(u, v, w, w, v)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 9 (inner_pasch1) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(w, fresh2(fresh8(true, true, u, v, w, v, w), true, v, inner_pasch(u, v, w, w, v)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(w, fresh2(fresh8(between(v, w, w), true, u, v, w, v, w), true, v, inner_pasch(u, v, w, w, v)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 13 (inner_pasch1) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(w, fresh2(fresh7(between(u, v, w), true, u, v, w, v, w), true, v, inner_pasch(u, v, w, w, v)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 2 (v_between_u_and_w) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(w, fresh2(fresh7(true, true, u, v, w, v, w), true, v, inner_pasch(u, v, w, w, v)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 10 (inner_pasch1) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(w, fresh2(true, true, v, inner_pasch(u, v, w, w, v)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 4 (identity_for_betweeness) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(w, inner_pasch(u, v, w, w, v), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 11 (inner_pasch2) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh6(true, true, u, v, w, v, w)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh6(between(v, w, w), true, u, v, w, v, w)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 14 (inner_pasch2) }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh5(between(u, v, w), true, u, v, w, v, w)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 2 (v_between_u_and_w) }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh5(true, true, u, v, w, v, w)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 12 (inner_pasch2) }
% 0.21/0.51    true
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Lemma 17: between(x, w, u) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Proof:
% 0.21/0.51    between(x, w, u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 6 (identity_for_betweeness) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(x, fresh2(between(w, inner_pasch(u, w, x, x, w), w), true, w, inner_pasch(u, w, x, x, w)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 9 (inner_pasch1) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(x, fresh2(fresh8(true, true, u, w, x, w, x), true, w, inner_pasch(u, w, x, x, w)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(x, fresh2(fresh8(between(w, x, x), true, u, w, x, w, x), true, w, inner_pasch(u, w, x, x, w)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 13 (inner_pasch1) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(x, fresh2(fresh7(between(u, w, x), true, u, w, x, w, x), true, w, inner_pasch(u, w, x, x, w)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 1 (w_between_u_and_x) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(x, fresh2(fresh7(true, true, u, w, x, w, x), true, w, inner_pasch(u, w, x, x, w)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 10 (inner_pasch1) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(x, fresh2(true, true, w, inner_pasch(u, w, x, x, w)), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 4 (identity_for_betweeness) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(x, inner_pasch(u, w, x, x, w), u)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 11 (inner_pasch2) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh6(true, true, u, w, x, w, x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh6(between(w, x, x), true, u, w, x, w, x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 14 (inner_pasch2) }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh5(between(u, w, x), true, u, w, x, w, x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 1 (w_between_u_and_x) }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh5(true, true, u, w, x, w, x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 12 (inner_pasch2) }
% 0.21/0.51    true
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Goal 1 (prove_w_between_v_and_x): between(v, w, x) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Proof:
% 0.21/0.51    between(v, w, x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 6 (identity_for_betweeness) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(v, fresh2(between(w, inner_pasch(x, w, u, v, w), w), true, w, inner_pasch(x, w, u, v, w)), x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 9 (inner_pasch1) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(v, fresh2(fresh8(true, true, x, w, u, w, v), true, w, inner_pasch(x, w, u, v, w)), x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    between(v, fresh2(fresh8(between(w, v, u), true, x, w, u, w, v), true, w, inner_pasch(x, w, u, v, w)), x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 13 (inner_pasch1) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(v, fresh2(fresh7(between(x, w, u), true, x, w, u, w, v), true, w, inner_pasch(x, w, u, v, w)), x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by lemma 17 }
% 0.21/0.51    between(v, fresh2(fresh7(true, true, x, w, u, w, v), true, w, inner_pasch(x, w, u, v, w)), x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 10 (inner_pasch1) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(v, fresh2(true, true, w, inner_pasch(x, w, u, v, w)), x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 4 (identity_for_betweeness) }
% 0.21/0.51    between(v, inner_pasch(x, w, u, v, w), x)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 11 (inner_pasch2) R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh6(true, true, x, w, u, w, v)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh6(between(w, v, u), true, x, w, u, w, v)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 14 (inner_pasch2) }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh5(between(x, w, u), true, x, w, u, w, v)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by lemma 17 }
% 0.21/0.51    fresh5(true, true, x, w, u, w, v)
% 0.21/0.51  = { by axiom 12 (inner_pasch2) }
% 0.21/0.51    true
% 0.21/0.51  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------