TSTP Solution File: GEO043-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GEO043-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:31:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 12 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 58 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(identity_for_betweeness,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ between(X1,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',identity_for_betweeness) ).
cnf(inner_pasch2,axiom,
( between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X4,X5,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',inner_pasch2) ).
cnf(identity_for_equidistance,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',identity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',segment_construction2) ).
cnf(w_between_u_and_x,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',w_between_u_and_x) ).
cnf(segment_construction1,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',segment_construction1) ).
cnf(v_between_u_and_w,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',v_between_u_and_w) ).
cnf(inner_pasch1,axiom,
( between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X4,X5,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',inner_pasch1) ).
cnf(prove_w_between_v_and_x,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p',prove_w_between_v_and_x) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ between(X1,X2,X1) ),
identity_for_betweeness ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X4,X5,X3) ),
inner_pasch2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3) ),
identity_for_equidistance ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
segment_construction2 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X1,X4) = X1
| ~ between(X4,X1,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
w_between_u_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
segment_construction1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
extension(X1,X2,X3,X3) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
( inner_pasch(w,X1,x,w,u) = w
| ~ between(w,X1,x) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
between(X1,X2,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
v_between_u_and_w ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
( between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X4,X5,X3) ),
inner_pasch1 ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
inner_pasch(w,x,x,w,u) = w,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
( inner_pasch(v,X1,w,v,u) = v
| ~ between(v,X1,w) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
between(x,w,u),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_14]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
inner_pasch(v,w,w,v,u) = v,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
( inner_pasch(w,X1,u,w,x) = w
| ~ between(w,X1,u) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
between(w,v,u),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_24]),c_0_19]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
inner_pasch(w,v,u,w,x) = w,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
prove_w_between_v_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_27]),c_0_23]),c_0_26])]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO043-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:54:55 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJYeOMJ3L4/E---3.1_10924.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 11132 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 888s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with pid 11143 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 888s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 21
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 71
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 103
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 73
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 103
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 71
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 49
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 22
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 164
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 21
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 267
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 132
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 108
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1764
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1632 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.033 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.041 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------