TSTP Solution File: GEO039-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO039-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.21s 2.42s
% Output : Refutation 2.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : GEO039-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:16:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.39 Sat Jun 18 05:16:53 2022
% 0.14/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 1059.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 54 during input processing: 0 [demod,57] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 55 during input processing: 0 [demod,57] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.39 53 back subsumes 50.
% 0.14/0.39 58 back subsumes 48.
% 0.14/0.39 58 back subsumes 35.
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [copy,63,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.39 63 back subsumes 49.
% 0.14/0.39 64 back subsumes 36.
% 0.14/0.39 71 back subsumes 40.
% 0.14/0.39 71 back subsumes 39.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.94/1.16 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.94/1.16 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.94/1.16 number of clauses in intial UL: 39
% 0.94/1.16 number of clauses initially in problem: 59
% 0.94/1.16 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.94/1.16 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 68
% 0.94/1.16 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.94/1.16 absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.94/1.16 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.94/1.16 distinct function count: 6
% 0.94/1.16 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.94/1.16
% 0.94/1.16 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.21/2.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.21/2.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Model 5 [ 5 27 115669 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.01 sec ----> 195 [binary,194.1,162.1] {-} $F.
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Length of proof is 12. Level of proof is 6.
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.21/2.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.21/2.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 4 [] {+} -between(A,B,A)|A=B.
% 2.21/2.42 5 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(B,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),D).
% 2.21/2.42 30 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(A,B,D)| -equidistant(B,C,B,D)|A=B|C=D.
% 2.21/2.42 34 [] {-} -between(v,w,x).
% 2.21/2.42 38 [factor,5.1.2] {+} -between(A,B,C)|between(B,inner_pasch(A,B,C,B,A),A).
% 2.21/2.42 64 [] {-} equidistant(A,A,B,B).
% 2.21/2.42 71 [] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 2.21/2.42 72 [] {-} between(u,w,x).
% 2.21/2.42 73 [] {-} u=x.
% 2.21/2.42 75,74 [copy,73,flip.1] {+} x=u.
% 2.21/2.42 78 [back_demod,72,demod,75] {+} between(u,w,u).
% 2.21/2.42 79 [back_demod,34,demod,75] {+} -between(v,w,u).
% 2.21/2.42 117 [para_into,79.1.2,30.5.1] {-} -between(v,A,u)| -between(B,C,w)| -between(B,C,A)| -equidistant(C,w,C,A)|B=C.
% 2.21/2.42 123 [para_into,79.1.2,4.2.1] {-} -between(v,A,u)| -between(w,A,w).
% 2.21/2.42 146 [factor,117.1.3,unit_del,71] {+} -between(v,u,w)| -equidistant(u,w,u,u)|v=u.
% 2.21/2.42 158 [hyper,78,38] {-} between(w,inner_pasch(u,w,u,w,u),u).
% 2.21/2.42 161,160 [hyper,78,4,flip.1] {-} w=u.
% 2.21/2.42 162 [back_demod,158,demod,161,161,161] {-} between(u,inner_pasch(u,u,u,u,u),u).
% 2.21/2.42 172,171 [back_demod,146,demod,161,161,unit_del,71,64] {-} v=u.
% 2.21/2.42 194 [back_demod,123,demod,172,161,161,factor_simp] {-} -between(u,A,u).
% 2.21/2.42 195 [binary,194.1,162.1] {-} $F.
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.21/2.42 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 ============ end of search ============
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 2.21/2.42 false clauses given 4
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 FALSE TRUE
% 2.21/2.42 3 0 1
% 2.21/2.42 4 0 1
% 2.21/2.42 5 2 0
% 2.21/2.42 7 1 1
% 2.21/2.42 8 3 2
% 2.21/2.42 9 5 0
% 2.21/2.42 10 2 0
% 2.21/2.42 12 0 2
% 2.21/2.42 13 0 2
% 2.21/2.42 14 0 2
% 2.21/2.42 15 4 0
% 2.21/2.42 16 0 2
% 2.21/2.42 17 3 7
% 2.21/2.42 18 1 0
% 2.21/2.42 19 0 3
% 2.21/2.42 20 6 5
% 2.21/2.42 21 6 1
% 2.21/2.42 22 5 1
% 2.21/2.42 23 3 0
% 2.21/2.42 25 0 1
% 2.21/2.42 26 3 0
% 2.21/2.42 30 0 1
% 2.21/2.42 31 0 3
% 2.21/2.42 33 0 3
% 2.21/2.42 36 0 1
% 2.21/2.42 37 0 3
% 2.21/2.42 tot: 44 42 (48.8% true)
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Model 5 [ 5 27 115669 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.21/2.42
% 2.21/2.42 Process 1059 finished Sat Jun 18 05:16:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------