TSTP Solution File: GEO039-3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GEO039-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (   5 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(w_between_u_and_x,hypothesis,
    between(u,w,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t1qlWNzblu/E---3.1_24638.p',w_between_u_and_x) ).

cnf(u_is_x,hypothesis,
    u = x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t1qlWNzblu/E---3.1_24638.p',u_is_x) ).

cnf(prove_corollary,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(v,w,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t1qlWNzblu/E---3.1_24638.p',prove_corollary) ).

cnf(identity_for_betweeness,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t1qlWNzblu/E---3.1_24638.p',identity_for_betweeness) ).

cnf(t3,axiom,
    between(X1,X2,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t1qlWNzblu/E---3.1_24638.p',t3) ).

cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
    between(u,w,x),
    w_between_u_and_x ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    u = x,
    u_is_x ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(v,w,x),
    prove_corollary ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X1) ),
    identity_for_betweeness ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    between(u,w,u),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(v,w,u),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    w = u,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    between(X1,X2,X2),
    t3 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO039-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 06:49:24 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t1qlWNzblu/E---3.1_24638.p
% 0.21/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # new_bool_3 with pid 24797 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # partial match(2): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with pid 24800 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # partial match(2): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 47
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 25
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 22
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 22
% 0.21/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 29
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 29
% 0.21/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.21/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.21/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.21/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 50
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 25
% 0.21/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 302
% 0.21/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245
% 0.21/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 12
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 605
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------