TSTP Solution File: GEO039-3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GEO039-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:31:13 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 5 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(w_between_u_and_x,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jVKw4g2mZs/E---3.1_17495.p',w_between_u_and_x) ).
cnf(u_is_x,hypothesis,
u = x,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jVKw4g2mZs/E---3.1_17495.p',u_is_x) ).
cnf(prove_corollary,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jVKw4g2mZs/E---3.1_17495.p',prove_corollary) ).
cnf(identity_for_betweeness,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ between(X1,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jVKw4g2mZs/E---3.1_17495.p',identity_for_betweeness) ).
cnf(t3,axiom,
between(X1,X2,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jVKw4g2mZs/E---3.1_17495.p',t3) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
w_between_u_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
u = x,
u_is_x ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
prove_corollary ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ between(X1,X2,X1) ),
identity_for_betweeness ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
between(u,w,u),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,u),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
w = u,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
between(X1,X2,X2),
t3 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14 % Problem : GEO039-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.15/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.38 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:40:44 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jVKw4g2mZs/E---3.1_17495.p
% 0.23/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # new_bool_1 with pid 17616 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.23/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.49 # partial match(2): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with pid 17620 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.23/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.49 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.49 # partial match(2): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 47
% 0.23/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 25
% 0.23/0.49 # Initial clauses : 22
% 0.23/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.23/0.49 # Processed clauses : 29
% 0.23/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 29
% 0.23/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.23/0.49 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.23/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.23/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.23/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 50
% 0.23/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 25
% 0.23/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 302
% 0.23/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245
% 0.23/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 0.23/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 605
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.49 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.23/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------