TSTP Solution File: GEO039-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GEO039-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:31:13 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 8 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(w_between_u_and_x,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ8UWlxjPE/E---3.1_14310.p',w_between_u_and_x) ).
cnf(u_is_x,hypothesis,
u = x,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ8UWlxjPE/E---3.1_14310.p',u_is_x) ).
cnf(identity_for_betweeness,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ between(X1,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ8UWlxjPE/E---3.1_14310.p',identity_for_betweeness) ).
cnf(identity_for_equidistance,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ8UWlxjPE/E---3.1_14310.p',identity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ8UWlxjPE/E---3.1_14310.p',segment_construction2) ).
cnf(prove_corollary,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ8UWlxjPE/E---3.1_14310.p',prove_corollary) ).
cnf(segment_construction1,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ8UWlxjPE/E---3.1_14310.p',segment_construction1) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
w_between_u_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
u = x,
u_is_x ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ between(X1,X2,X1) ),
identity_for_betweeness ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
between(x,w,x),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3) ),
identity_for_equidistance ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
segment_construction2 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
prove_corollary ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
w = x,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
segment_construction1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
extension(X1,X2,X3,X3) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,x,x),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
between(X1,X2,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GEO039-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:55:15 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gJ8UWlxjPE/E---3.1_14310.p
% 0.22/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # sh5l with pid 14404 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.51 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 178s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with pid 14411 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.51 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 178s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.22/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 8
% 0.22/0.51 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.22/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.22/0.51 # Processed clauses : 21
% 0.22/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.22/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.22/0.51 # Generated clauses : 21
% 0.22/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20
% 0.22/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Paramodulations : 21
% 0.22/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.22/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.22/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.22/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 49
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 76
% 0.22/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.22/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.22/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 39
% 0.22/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.22/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 600
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.51 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.22/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------