TSTP Solution File: GEO038-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO038-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.63s 2.90s
% Output : Refutation 2.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO038-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:13:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Sat Jun 18 13:13:24 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3755.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 35 back subsumes 32.
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [copy,41,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.58 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.58 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.58 number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.19/0.58 number of clauses initially in problem: 39
% 0.19/0.58 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.19/0.58 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 0.19/0.58 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.58 absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.19/0.58 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.19/0.58 distinct function count: 5
% 0.19/0.58 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.63/2.90 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.63/2.90 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Model 3 [ 42 62 222481 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Model 4 [ 56 63 226523 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.52 sec ----> 193 [binary,192.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.63/2.90 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.63/2.90 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 16 [] {+} -between(u,v,y).
% 2.63/2.90 36 [] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 2.63/2.90 38 [] {-} y=extension(u,v,w,x).
% 2.63/2.90 39 [copy,38,flip.1] {-} extension(u,v,w,x)=y.
% 2.63/2.90 192 [para_from,39.1.1,36.1.3] {-} between(u,v,y).
% 2.63/2.90 193 [binary,192.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.63/2.90 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 ============ end of search ============
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 true clauses given 1 (16.7%)
% 2.63/2.90 false clauses given 5
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 FALSE TRUE
% 2.63/2.90 5 0 1
% 2.63/2.90 7 0 1
% 2.63/2.90 9 1 1
% 2.63/2.90 11 0 1
% 2.63/2.90 13 2 1
% 2.63/2.90 14 1 2
% 2.63/2.90 15 0 1
% 2.63/2.90 16 1 0
% 2.63/2.90 17 1 2
% 2.63/2.90 18 0 2
% 2.63/2.90 20 1 0
% 2.63/2.90 23 0 1
% 2.63/2.90 24 1 0
% 2.63/2.90 28 1 1
% 2.63/2.90 30 0 3
% 2.63/2.90 31 0 1
% 2.63/2.90 33 3 0
% 2.63/2.90 34 3 4
% 2.63/2.90 35 1 2
% 2.63/2.90 36 2 1
% 2.63/2.90 37 1 1
% 2.63/2.90 38 1 2
% 2.63/2.90 39 2 1
% 2.63/2.90 40 1 0
% 2.63/2.90 41 1 1
% 2.63/2.90 42 1 0
% 2.63/2.90 43 2 1
% 2.63/2.90 44 1 2
% 2.63/2.90 45 1 3
% 2.63/2.90 49 1 0
% 2.63/2.90 50 1 1
% 2.63/2.90 tot: 31 37 (54.4% true)
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Model 4 [ 56 63 226523 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.63/2.90
% 2.63/2.90 Process 3755 finished Sat Jun 18 13:13:27 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------